SB 910 California Senate · 2011-2012 Regular Session

Vehicles: bicycles: passing distance.

Summary
(1) Under existing law, a driver of a vehicle overtaking another vehicle or a bicycle proceeding in the same direction is required to pass to the left at a safe distance without interfering with the safe operation of the overtaken vehicle or bicycle, subject to certain limitations and exceptions. A violation of this provision is an infraction punishable by a fine not exceeding $100 for a first conviction, and up to a $250 fine for a 3rd and subsequent conviction occurring within one year of 2 or more prior infractions. This bill would recast this provision as to overtaking and passing a bicycle by requiring the driver of a motor vehicle overtaking and passing a bicycle that is proceeding in the same direction on a highway to pass in compliance with specified requirements applicable to overtaking and passing a vehicle, and to do so at a safe distance that does not interfere with the safe operation of the overtaken bicycle, having due regard for the size and speed of the motor vehicle and the bicycle, traffic conditions, weather, and the surface and width of the highway. The bill would prohibit the driver of the motor vehicle that is overtaking or passing a bicycle proceeding in the same direction on a highway from passing at a distance of less than 3 feet between any part of the motor vehicle and any part of the bicycle or its operator, except as provided. The bill would make a violation of this provision an infraction punishable by a $35 fine. The bill would also require the imposition of a $220 fine on a driver if a collision occurs between a motor vehicle and a bicyclist causing bodily harm to the bicyclist, and the driver is found to be in violation of the above provisions. (2) Existing law prohibits a person from driving a vehicle to the left of double parallel solid lines, or double parallel lines, one of which is broken, except as provided. Notwithstanding that prohibition, existing law permits a driver to cross those double parallel lines if the driver is turning to the left at any intersection or into or out of a driveway or private road or making a U-turn under the rules governing that turn. This bill would limit the above prohibition, relating to unbroken double parallel solid lines, to solid yellow lines. The bill would prohibit a person driving a vehicle from crossing over any part of any double parallel solid white lines except in the above situations or when entering or exiting designated areas of exclusive or preferential use lanes, as provided. The bill would permit a driver of a motor vehicle to cross double parallel lines in a substandard width lane, as described, to pass a person operating a bicycle in the same direction, if in compliance with a specified provision. Because this bill would create a new crime and would expand the scope of an existing crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (3) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status vetoed 4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Sep 2011
Senate Passage
Jun 2011
Assembly Passage
Sep 2011
Vetoed
Mar 2012
Introduced Feb 18, 2011 Vetoed Mar 1, 2012
Floor votes · Senate Jun 2, 2011 · Assembly Sep 7, 2011

How they voted

27–8
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 39
Jun 2, 2011
D Democratic24
22 Yea 2
91% Yea
R Republican15
5 Yea 8 Nay 2
53% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
31
Key actions
6
Committee
7
Amendments
2
Mar 1, 2012
Vetoed
Veto sustained.
upper
Mar 1, 2012
Vetoed
Consideration of Governor's veto stricken from file.
upper
Oct 7, 2011
Vetoed
In Senate. Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
upper
Oct 7, 2011
Vetoed
Vetoed by the Governor.
upper
Sep 8, 2011
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 27. Noes 11. Page 2402.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Sep 7, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (43-25-11)
assembly
Sep 7, 2011
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Jul 6, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 11. Noes 5.) (July 6).
lower
Jun 28, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 5.) (June 27). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 9, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on TRANS.
lower
Jun 2, 2011
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (27-8-4)
senate
May 23, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
May 9, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 3. Page 865.) (May 3).
upper
Apr 7, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on T. & H.
upper
Mar 10, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Feb 18, 2011
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
0 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

No sponsor information available.