SB 88 California Senate · 2011-2012 Regular Session

Elections: names of candidates.

Summary
Existing law requires the translation of ballots and ballot materials into languages other than English when specified circumstances exist. This bill would require that, if a jurisdiction provides a translation of the candidates' alphabet-based names into a character-based language, such as Chinese, Japanese, or Korean, phonetic transliterations of the alphabet-based names of candidates be provided. The bill would also require that if a candidate's name is to appear on the ballot in more than one jurisdiction in an election then all of those jurisdictions must use the same phonetic transliteration or character-based translation of the name. This bill would provide an exception for a candidate who has a character-based name by birth or has verifiably been known by a character-based name for at least 2 years to permit him or her to use that name on the ballot instead of a phonetic transliteration. This bill would require that, if a jurisdiction provides separate ballots containing translations of the candidates' names in different languages, both the alphabet-based names and the translations of the candidates' names appear on the translated ballot. This bill would also require a county to purchase voting equipment that permits compliance with this section as a part of any new purchase of voting equipment. Because the bill would impose additional duties on local elections officials, it would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill status vetoed 4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2011
Committee Review
Aug 2011
Senate Passage
Apr 2011
Assembly Passage
Jul 2011
Vetoed
Feb 2012
Introduced Jan 10, 2011 Vetoed Feb 29, 2012
Floor votes · Senate Apr 25, 2011 · Assembly Jul 11, 2011

How they voted

300
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 31
Apr 25, 2011
D Democratic20
19 Yea 1
95% Yea
R Republican11
11 Yea
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
27
Key actions
6
Committee
6
Amendments
2
Feb 29, 2012
Vetoed
Veto sustained.
upper
Feb 29, 2012
Vetoed
Consideration of Governor's veto stricken from file.
upper
Sep 6, 2011
Vetoed
In Senate. Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
upper
Sep 6, 2011
Vetoed
Vetoed by the Governor.
upper
Aug 15, 2011
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 38. Noes 0. Page 1915.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Jul 11, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (68-0-2)
assembly
Jul 11, 2011
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Jul 6, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (July 6).
lower
Jun 22, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 21).
lower
May 2, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on E. & R.
lower
Apr 25, 2011
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (30-0-1)
senate
Apr 11, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Mar 16, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 358.) (March 15). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jan 20, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on E. & C.A.
upper
Jan 10, 2011
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 7 co-sponsors

Sponsors