Contractors: expertise: legal representation.
Summary
Existing law requires a board under the Business and Professions Code, including the Contractors' State License Board, to provide legal representation to any person hired or under contract who provides expertise to the board in the evaluation of an applicant or the conduct of a licensee when that person is named vas a defendant in a civil action arising out of the evaluation or any opinions rendered, statements made, or testimony given to the board. Existing law provides that the board is not liable for any judgment rendered against that person. Existing law requires the Attorney General to be utilized in the action and his or her services charged to the board. Existing law authorizes the Contractors' State License Board to contract with professionals whose skills or expertise are required to aid in the investigation or prosecution of a licensee, registrant, applicant for a license or registration, or those subject to licensure or registration by the board. This bill would require the Contractors' State License Board to provide for representation to any professional who provides expertise to the board in the evaluation of the conduct of a licensee, registrant, or applicant when, as a result of providing that expertise, the professional is named as a defendant in a civil action. The bill would further require that representation in any proceeding instituted by the board or to which the board is a party, and would require the board to pay for any services rendered by the Attorney General. The bill would require indemnification for any judgment rendered against the professional, as specified.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Jun 2011
Senate Passage
May 2011
Assembly Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 18, 2011
Last action Jun 19, 2012
Floor votes · Senate May 12, 2011
How they voted
31–0
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 35
May 12, 2011
D
Democratic23
82% Yea
R
Republican12
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
15
Key actions
2
Committee
5
Jun 21, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (June 21). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
May 23, 2011
Committee
Referred to Coms. on B., P. & C.P. and JUD.
lower
May 12, 2011
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (31-0-4)
senate
May 3, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Apr 5, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 541.) (April 4). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Mar 10, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on B., P. & E.D.
upper
Feb 18, 2011
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
0 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
No sponsor information available.
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 865
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 865. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline