Medical Marijuana Program: zoning restrictions: residential use.
Summary
Existing law, the Compassionate Use Act of 1996, an initiative measure, prohibits prosecution, pursuant to provisions of law relating to the possession or cultivation of marijuana, of a patient or a patient's primary caregiver who possesses or cultivates marijuana for the personal medical purposes of the patient upon the written or oral recommendation or approval of a physician. Existing law, the Medical Marijuana Program, requires the State Department of Public Health to establish a voluntary program for the issuance of identification cards to patients and primary caregivers under the Compassionate Use Act, and grants immunity from arrest for violation of proscribed provisions relating to the cultivation, possession, transportation, and sale of marijuana, if conditions of the act are met. The Medical Marijuana Program prohibits a medical marijuana cooperative, collective, dispensary, operator, establishment, or provider from being located within a 600-foot radius of a school. This bill would, also, prohibit a marijuana cooperative, collective, dispensary, operator, establishment, or provider from being located within a 600-foot radius of a residential zone or residential use unless a local ordinance, which may be more or less restrictive than the standard, is passed by the city council or county board of supervisors specifically regulating the location of these establishments in relation to residential zones or residential use. The bill would define "city" for these purposes to mean a general law city, a charter city, and a city and county. The bill would declare establishment of proximity standards to be of statewide concern and not a municipal affair. By changing the definition of an existing crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Aug 2011
Senate Passage
Jun 2011
Assembly Passage
Aug 2011
Vetoed
Mar 2012
Introduced Feb 18, 2011
Vetoed Mar 1, 2012
Floor votes · Senate Jun 2, 2011 · Assembly Aug 25, 2011
How they voted
26–2
Passed · 7 other
Total votes 35
Jun 2, 2011
D
Democratic23
65% Yea
R
Republican12
91% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
34
Key actions
6
Committee
9
Amendments
3
Mar 1, 2012
Vetoed
Veto sustained.
upper
Mar 1, 2012
Vetoed
Consideration of Governor's veto stricken from file.
upper
Sep 21, 2011
Vetoed
In Senate. Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
upper
Sep 20, 2011
Vetoed
Vetoed by the Governor.
upper
Aug 30, 2011
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 34. Noes 4. Page 2152.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Aug 25, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (61-5-6)
assembly
Aug 25, 2011
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Aug 22, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (August 17).
lower
Jun 30, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (June 29). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 22, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. (Ayes 16. Noes 1.) (June 21). Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Jun 9, 2011
Committee
Referred to Coms. on HEALTH and L. GOV.
lower
Jun 2, 2011
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (26-2-7)
senate
May 23, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
May 9, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0. Page 886.) (May 5).
upper
May 2, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Apr 27, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on RLS. (Ayes 6. Noes 0. Page 763.) (April 27). Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Mar 17, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Coms. on GOV. & F. and HEALTH.
upper
Mar 10, 2011
Committee
Referred to Coms. on HEALTH and GOV. & F.
upper
Feb 18, 2011
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Lou Correa
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 847
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 847. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline