Integrated regional water management plans: contents.
Summary
The Integrated Regional Water Management Planning Act of 2002 authorizes a regional water management group, as defined, to prepare and adopt an integrated regional water management plan. The act requires an integrated regional water management plan to address specified water quality and water supply matters. This bill would additionally require an integrated regional water management plan to identify the manner in which the plan furthers a specified state policy concerning reducing reliance on the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta for water supply and improving regional self-reliance for water, if the region depends on water from the Delta watershed. The bill would require integrated regional water management plans to incorporate that requirement when they are developed, updated, or amended in accordance with guidelines established by the Department of Water Resources. For an application for funding for a plan that is made prior to an update or amendment of the plan, the bill would require an applicant to specify how the existing plan advances the specified state policy concerning reducing reliance on the Delta for water supply and improving regional self-reliance for water.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Sep 2011
Senate Passage
May 2011
Assembly Passage
Aug 2011
Vetoed
Mar 2012
Introduced Feb 18, 2011
Vetoed Mar 1, 2012
Floor votes · Assembly Aug 30, 2011
How they voted
43–24
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 70
Aug 30, 2011
D
Democratic44
97% Yea
R
Republican26
92% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
27
Key actions
4
Committee
3
Amendments
3
Mar 1, 2012
Vetoed
Veto sustained.
upper
Mar 1, 2012
Vetoed
Consideration of Governor's veto stricken from file.
upper
Oct 2, 2011
Vetoed
In Senate. Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
upper
Oct 2, 2011
Vetoed
Vetoed by the Governor.
upper
Sep 1, 2011
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 24. Noes 15. Page 2236.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Aug 30, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (43-24-3)
assembly
Aug 30, 2011
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Jun 28, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 9. Noes 3.) (June 28).
lower
May 27, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on W., P. & W.
lower
Apr 12, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 3. Page 620.) (April 12).
upper
Mar 10, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on N.R. & W.
upper
Feb 18, 2011
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 4 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 834
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 834. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline