SB 829 California Senate · 2011-2012 Regular Session

Public contracts: public entities: project labor agreements.

Summary
Existing law sets forth the requirements for the solicitation and evaluation of bids and the awarding of contracts by public entities and authorizes a public entity to use, enter into, or require contractors to enter into, a project labor agreement for a construction project if the agreement includes specified taxpayer protection provisions. Existing law also provides that if a charter provision, initiative, or ordinance of a charter city prohibits the governing board's consideration of a project labor agreement for a project to be awarded by the city, or prohibits the governing board from considering whether to allocate funds to a city-funded project covered by such an agreement, state funding or financial assistance may not be used to support that project, as specified. This bill would additionally provide that if a charter provision, initiative, or ordinance of a charter city prohibits, limits, or constrains in any way the governing board's authority or discretion to adopt, require, or utilize a project labor agreement that includes specified taxpayer protection provisions for some or all of the construction projects to be awarded by the city, state funding or financial assistance may not be used to support any construction projects awarded by the city, as specified.
Bill status signed all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Apr 2012
Senate Passage
Jun 2011
Assembly Passage
Apr 2012
Signed into Law
Apr 2012
Introduced Feb 18, 2011 Signed Apr 26, 2012
Floor votes · Senate Apr 19, 2012 · Assembly Apr 12, 2012

How they voted

2010
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 31
Apr 19, 2012
D Democratic20
20 Yea
100% Yea
R Republican11
10 Nay 1
90% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
40
Key actions
10
Committee
12
Amendments
4
Apr 26, 2012
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Apr 19, 2012
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (20-10-1)
senate
Apr 19, 2012
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 25. Noes 13. Page 3218.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Apr 18, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: That the Assembly amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 6. Noes 3. Page 3206.)
upper
Apr 16, 2012
Committee
From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on GOV. & F. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10. (Ayes 3. Noes 0. Page 3165.) Re-referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
upper
Apr 16, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10.
upper
Apr 12, 2012
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (42-22-6)
assembly
Apr 12, 2012
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Mar 28, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 11. Noes 4.) (March 28).
lower
Mar 13, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 2.) (March 13).
lower
Mar 1, 2012
Committee
From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on B., P. & C.P. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (March 1). Re-referred to Com. on B., P. & C.P.
lower
Feb 27, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
lower
Aug 17, 2011
Lower · Passed
Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Jul 7, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (July 6). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 16, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on L. & E.
lower
May 27, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 6. Noes 3. Page 1122.) (May 26).
upper
May 2, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 766.) (April 27).
upper
Mar 31, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on L. & I.R.
upper
Mar 10, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Feb 18, 2011
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
0 primary · 12 co-sponsors

Sponsors

No sponsor information available.