Workers' compensation: data reporting requirement: administrative penalties.
Summary
Existing law establishes a workers' compensation system, administered by the Administrative Director of the Division of Workers' Compensation, to compensate an employee for injuries sustained in the course of his or her employment. Existing law requires the administrative director to develop a cost-efficient workers' compensation information system and requires the administrative director to adopt regulations specifying the data elements to be collected by electronic data interchange. Existing law establishes the Workers' Compensation Administration Revolving Fund in the State Treasury. Money in the fund may be expended by the Department of Industrial Relations, upon appropriation by the Legislature, for the administration of the workers' compensation program, except as provided, and for the Return-to-Work Program. This bill would require the administrative director to assess an administrative penalty against a claims administrator for a violation of data reporting requirements. This bill would require the administrative director to promulgate a schedule of penalties providing for an assessment of no more than $5,000 against a claims administrator in any single year, calculated by violation type and excluding threshold rates of violations, as prescribed. This bill would provide that any penalty is to be deposited in the Workers' Compensation Administration Revolving Fund. Existing law provides that a person who, or public or private entity that, is not a party to a claim for workers' compensation benefits may not obtain individually identifiable information, as defined, that is obtained or maintained by the division on that claim, except as specified. This bill would require the administrative director to publish an annual report disclosing the compliance rates of claims administrators and would authorize the administrative director to publish the identity of claims administrators for this purpose.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Aug 2011
Senate Passage
Jun 2011
Assembly Passage
Aug 2011
Signed into Law
Oct 2011
Introduced Feb 18, 2011
Signed Oct 7, 2011
Floor votes · Senate Jun 2, 2011 · Assembly Aug 30, 2011
How they voted
30–8
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 39
Jun 2, 2011
D
Democratic24
100% Yea
R
Republican15
53% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
26
Key actions
5
Committee
6
Oct 7, 2011
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 30, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (65-9-5)
assembly
Aug 18, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (August 17).
lower
Jul 6, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (July 6). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 16, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on INS.
lower
Jun 2, 2011
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (30-8-1)
senate
May 26, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 2. Page 1122.) (May 26).
upper
Apr 13, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0. Page 643.) (April 13). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Mar 10, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on L. & I.R.
upper
Feb 18, 2011
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
ML
Mark Leno
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 826
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 826. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline