State employees: military leave: salary overpayment.
Summary
Existing law requires the state, when it determines that an overpayment of compensation has been made to an employee, to notify the employee of the overpayment and afford the employee an opportunity to respond before commencing recoupment actions. Existing law requires that administrative action to recover an overpayment from a state employee be initiated within 3 years from the date of overpayment. Existing law provides that a state employee who is granted a military leave of absence for active duty, whose continuous state service is not broken by a permanent separation, shall be entitled to receive his or her salary for a period not to exceed 30 calendar days in any one fiscal year. This bill would provide, until January 1, 2015, that when the state determines that an overpayment of compensation has been made to a state employee on a leave of absence for active military duty as a member of the California National Guard, administrative action to recover overpayment be initiated within 6 years from the date of overpayment, notwithstanding existing law, unless specified conditions exist. The bill would make this provision applicable to any overpayment made up to 6 years prior to the operative date of this measure, as specified. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Sep 2011
Senate Passage
Jul 2011
Assembly Passage
Sep 2011
Signed into Law
Sep 2011
Introduced Feb 18, 2011
Signed Sep 30, 2011
Floor votes · Senate Jul 11, 2011 · Assembly Sep 9, 2011
How they voted
36–0
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 39
Jul 11, 2011
D
Democratic24
87% Yea
R
Republican15
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
32
Key actions
3
Committee
9
Amendments
1
Sep 30, 2011
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
Sep 9, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (78-0-1)
Sep 9, 2011
Senate · Reported by committee
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 40. Noes 0. Page 2465.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
Sep 9, 2011
Senate · Amendment offered
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
Aug 26, 2011
Assembly · Reported by committee
From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (August 25).
Aug 23, 2011
Assembly · Referred to committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (August 22). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
Aug 17, 2011
Assembly · Referred to committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on V.A. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (August 17). Re-referred to Com. on V.A.
Jul 14, 2011
Assembly · Referred to committee
Referred to Coms. on P.E., R. & S.S. and V.A.
Jul 11, 2011
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (36-0-3)
Jun 27, 2011
Senate · Reported by committee
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
Jun 15, 2011
Senate · Referred to committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 1462.) (June 14). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
Jun 8, 2011
Senate · Referred to committee
Re-referred to Com. on V.A.
Mar 10, 2011
Senate · Referred to committee
Referred to Com. on RLS.
Feb 18, 2011
Senate · Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
0 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
No sponsor information available.
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 806
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 806. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline