Public School Performance Accountability Program: Creative and Innovative Education Index.
Summary
The Public Schools Accountability Act of 1999 requires the Superintendent of Public Instruction to develop an Academic Performance Index (API) to measure the performance of schools and the academic performance of pupils. Existing law requires the Superintendent to establish an advisory committee to advise the Superintendent and the State Board of Education on all appropriate matters relative to the creation of the API and the implementation of an accountability system. Existing law requires the Superintendent and the state board, in consultation with the advisory committee, by July 1, 2013, to make recommendations to the Legislature and the Governor on, among other things, the establishment of a methodology for generating a measurement of group and individual academic performance growth by using individual pupil results from a longitudinally valid achievement assessment system. This bill would require the advisory committee to consult, as appropriate, with individuals who are experts or have experience in innovation in the fields of business, science, technology, mathematics, engineering, and arts education on the development of a voluntary Creative and Innovative Education Index, to be based in part on the creative opportunities in each participating school, as specified. The bill would require the advisory committee to make recommendations by June 1, 2014, to the Superintendent on the extent to which this index may be used to foster creative and innovative education in the public schools.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Aug 2012
Senate Passage
Jan 2012
Assembly Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 18, 2011
Last action Aug 16, 2012
Floor votes · Senate Jan 26, 2012
How they voted
23–10
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 35
Jan 26, 2012
D
Democratic23
100% Yea
R
Republican12
83% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
25
Key actions
6
Committee
8
Amendments
2
Aug 16, 2012
Lower · Passed
Set, second hearing. Held in committee and under submission.
lower
Aug 8, 2012
Committee
Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Jun 19, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 3.) (June 13).
lower
Apr 19, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
lower
Jan 26, 2012
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (23-10-2)
senate
Jan 19, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 2. Page 2686.) (January 19).
upper
May 26, 2011
Upper · Passed
Held in committee and under submission.
upper
Apr 26, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 25, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on ED.
upper
Apr 13, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on RLS. (Ayes 7. Noes 3. Page 558.) (April 6).
upper
Mar 10, 2011
Committee
Referred to Coms. on ED. and RLS.
upper
Feb 18, 2011
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
CD
Curren D Price
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 789
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 789. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline