Discrimination.
Summary
Existing law, the Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975, provides for the licensure and regulation of health care service plans and makes a willful violation of its provisions a crime. Existing law also provides for the regulation of health insurers by the Department of Insurance. Existing law requires a health care service plan and a health insurance policy to provide group coverage to the registered domestic partner of an employee, subscriber, insured, or policyholder that is equal to the coverage it provides to the spouse of those persons. This bill would specify that a plan or policy may not discriminate in coverage between spouses or domestic partners of a different sex and spouses or domestic partners of the same sex. Existing law provides that a policy or certificate of health insurance marketed, issued, or delivered to a California resident, regardless of the situs of the contract or master group policyholder, is generally subject to California insurance law, except for a policy issued outside of California to an employer whose principal place of business and majority of employees are located outside of California. This bill would provide that every group health care service plan contract and every group health insurance policy that is marketed, issued, or delivered to a California resident is subject to the requirements to provide equal coverage to domestic partners as is provided to spouses, notwithstanding any other provision of law. The bill would also provide that notwithstanding the exception for a policy issued outside of California to an employer whose principal place of business and majority of employees are located outside of California, no policy or certificate of health insurance marketed, issued, or delivered to a resident of this state shall discriminate in coverage between spouses or domestic partners of a different sex and spouses or domestic partners of the same sex. Because a willful violation of these provisions by a health care service plan would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Sep 2011
Senate Passage
May 2011
Assembly Passage
Sep 2011
Signed into Law
Oct 2011
Introduced Feb 18, 2011
Signed Oct 9, 2011
Floor votes · Senate May 31, 2011 · Assembly Sep 1, 2011
How they voted
24–13
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 39
May 31, 2011
D
Democratic24
100% Yea
R
Republican15
86% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
34
Key actions
8
Committee
9
Amendments
3
Oct 9, 2011
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 2, 2011
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 24. Noes 13. Page 2273.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Sep 1, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (49-24-6)
assembly
Sep 1, 2011
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Aug 18, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (August 17).
lower
Jul 1, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 3.) (June 28).
lower
Jun 22, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 13. Noes 5.) (June 21). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Jun 9, 2011
Committee
Referred to Coms. on HEALTH and JUD.
lower
May 31, 2011
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (24-13-2)
senate
May 17, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 2. Page 1014.) (May 16).
upper
May 4, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 3. Noes 2. Page 861.) (May 3). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 28, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 6. Noes 3. Page 786.) (April 27). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Apr 7, 2011
Upper · Passed
Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Mar 31, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Coms. on HEALTH and JUD.
upper
Mar 3, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Feb 18, 2011
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 757
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 757. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline