SB 745 California Senate · 2011-2012 Regular Session

Pupils: school attendance: school districts of choice.

Summary
Existing law defines a school district of choice as one in which the governing board of the school district has, by resolution, elected to accept interdistrict transfers and has determined the number of transfers it is willing to accept through a random, unbiased process, as specified. Existing law requires a school district of choice to give priority for attendance to siblings of children already in attendance in that school district. Existing law provides that a school district of choice may give priority for attendance to children of military personnel. Existing law authorizes a school district of choice to reject the transfer of a pupil if the transfer of that pupil would require the school district to create a new program to serve that pupil, except that a school district of choice is prohibited from rejecting the transfer of a special needs pupil, including an individual with exceptional needs and an English learner. This bill would require a school district of choice to give priority for attendance to English learners, pupils who are individuals with exceptional needs, and pupils who are eligible for free and reduced-price meals, as provided. This bill would require that a school district of choice ensure that a pupil who transfers into the school district is enrolled in a school with a higher Academic Performance Index score than the school in which the pupil was previously enrolled.
Bill status vetoed 4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Aug 2011
Senate Passage
Jun 2011
Assembly Passage
Jul 2011
Vetoed
Feb 2012
Introduced Feb 18, 2011 Vetoed Feb 29, 2012
Floor votes · Senate Aug 22, 2011 · Assembly Jul 11, 2011

How they voted

20–11
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 35
Aug 22, 2011
D Democratic23
20 Yea 3
86% Yea
R Republican12
11 Nay 1
91% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
30
Key actions
6
Committee
6
Amendments
2
Feb 29, 2012
Vetoed
Veto sustained.
upper
Feb 29, 2012
Vetoed
Consideration of Governor's veto stricken from file.
upper
Sep 6, 2011
Vetoed
In Senate. Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
upper
Sep 6, 2011
Vetoed
Vetoed by the Governor.
upper
Aug 22, 2011
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (20-11-4)
senate
Aug 22, 2011
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 22. Noes 13. Page 1999.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Jul 11, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (41-29-2)
assembly
Jul 11, 2011
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Jun 29, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 4.) (June 22).
lower
Jun 9, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
lower
May 11, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 3. Page 949.) (May 11).
upper
Apr 13, 2011
Upper · Passed
Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Mar 24, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on ED.
upper
Mar 3, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Feb 18, 2011
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Photo of Ed Hernandez
Ed Hernandez
DDemocratic
CA
22