Ports: congestion relief: air pollution mitigation.
Summary
(1) Existing law regulates the operation of ports and harbors. Existing law provides for the formation and organization of port districts. This bill would require the Ports of Long Beach, Los Angeles, and Oakland, beginning January 1, 2012, to assess their infrastructure and air quality improvement needs, including, but not limited to, projects that improve the efficiency of the movement of cargo, reduce congestion impacts associated with the movement of cargo, and reduce pollution associated with the movement of that cargo. The bill would require each port to provide this assessment to specified committees of the Legislature by July 1, 2012, and to include in the assessment the total costs of the infrastructure and air quality improvements, possible funding options for these projects, and estimated timelines for implementation. By imposing these additional duties upon the ports, this bill would establish a state-mandated local program. (2) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Sep 2011
Senate Passage
May 2011
Assembly Passage
Aug 2011
Signed into Law
Oct 2011
Introduced Feb 18, 2011
Signed Oct 2, 2011
Floor votes · Senate May 31, 2011 · Assembly Aug 31, 2011
How they voted
31–7
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 39
May 31, 2011
D
Democratic24
100% Yea
R
Republican15
46% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
26
Key actions
6
Committee
7
Amendments
2
Oct 2, 2011
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 1, 2011
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 32. Noes 7. Page 2244.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Aug 31, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (56-21-2)
assembly
Aug 31, 2011
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Jul 6, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 11. Noes 5.) (July 6).
lower
Jun 21, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 12. Noes 2.) (June 20). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 9, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on TRANS.
lower
May 31, 2011
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (31-7-1)
senate
May 17, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
May 3, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 856.) (May 2). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 5, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on E.Q. (Ayes 9. Noes 0. Page 544.) (April 5). Re-referred to Com. on E.Q.
upper
Mar 3, 2011
Committee
Referred to Coms. on T. & H. and E.Q.
upper
Feb 18, 2011
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
0 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
No sponsor information available.
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 739
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 739. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline