Restraining orders.
Summary
Existing law authorizes any court with jurisdiction over a criminal matter to issue protective orders upon a good cause belief that harm to, or intimidation or dissuasion of, a victim or witness has occurred or is reasonably likely to occur. Existing case law has construed any order issued pursuant to this provision to be limited in scope and duration to the protection of victims and witnesses in connection with the criminal proceeding in which it is issued. Under existing law, contempt of a court order is a misdemeanor. This bill would expand the scope and duration of that provision. The bill would require, in all cases in which a criminal defendant has been convicted of a crime of domestic violence, the court to consider, at the time of sentencing, issuing an order restraining the defendant from any contact with the victim, regardless of whether the defendant is sentenced to the state prison or a county jail, or whether imposition of sentence is suspended and the defendant is placed on probation. The order would be valid for up to 10 years, as determined by the court. Because the bill would expand the scope of an existing crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Jul 2011
Senate Passage
May 2011
Assembly Passage
Jul 2011
Signed into Law
Aug 2011
Introduced Feb 18, 2011
Signed Aug 1, 2011
Floor votes · Senate May 23, 2011 · Assembly Jul 14, 2011
How they voted
38–0
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 39
May 23, 2011
D
Democratic24
100% Yea
R
Republican15
93% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
27
Key actions
7
Committee
6
Amendments
1
Aug 1, 2011
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Jul 14, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (75-0-4)
assembly
Jul 6, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (July 6).
lower
Jun 20, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 14, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 14).
lower
Jun 2, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
May 23, 2011
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (38-0-1)
senate
May 10, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Apr 28, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 742.) (April 26).
upper
Mar 3, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Feb 18, 2011
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Fran Pavley
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 723
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 723. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline