SB 705 California Senate · 2011-2012 Regular Session

Natural gas: service and safety.

Summary
Under existing law, the Public Utilities Commission has regulatory authority over public utilities, including gas corporations, as defined. Existing law authorizes the commission to fix the rates and charges for every public utility, and requires that those rates and charges be just and reasonable. The Public Utilities Act authorizes the commission to ascertain and fix just and reasonable standards, classifications, regulations, practices, measurements, or services to be furnished, imposed, observed, and followed by specified public utilities, including gas corporations. Existing federal law requires the United States Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) to adopt minimum safety standards for pipeline transportation and for pipeline facilities, including an interstate gas pipeline facility and an intrastate gas pipeline facility, as defined. Existing law authorizes the United States Secretary of Transportation to prescribe or enforce safety standards and practices for an intrastate pipeline facility or intrastate pipeline transportation to the extent that the safety standards and practices are regulated by a state authority that annually submits to the secretary a certification for the facilities and transportation or, alternatively, authorizes the secretary to make an agreement with a state authority authorizing it to take necessary action to meet certain pipeline safety requirements. Existing federal law prohibits a state authority from adopting or continuing in force safety standards for interstate pipeline facilities or interstate pipeline transportation, but permits a state authority that has submitted a specified certification to adopt additional or more stringent safety standards for intrastate pipeline facilities and intrastate pipeline transportation only if those standards are compatible with the minimum standards prescribed by PHMSA. This bill would require each gas corporation to develop a plan, as specified, for the safe and reliable operation of its commission-regulated gas pipeline facility. The bill would require the commission to accept, modify, or reject the plan for each gas corporation by December 31, 2012, and to build into an approved plan sufficient flexibility to redirect activities to respond to safety requirements. The bill would require that the plan be periodically reviewed and updated. The bill would declare that it is the policy of the state to place safety of the public and gas corporation employees as the top priority and require the commission to require that the distribution rate of a gas corporation include sufficient revenues and employee staffing to provide for prompt provision of service to the public consistent with this policy. The bill would require the plan, discussed above, to set forth the manner in which the gas corporation will implement this policy and achieve specified objectives. The bill would require the commission to take all reasonable and appropriate actions to carry out that policy, as specified. Under existing law, a violation of the Public Utilities Act or any order, decision, rule, direction, demand, or requirement of the commission is a crime. Because the provisions of this bill would be a part of the act and because a violation of an order or decision of the commission implementing its requirements would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program by creating a new crime. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status signed all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Sep 2011
Senate Passage
Jun 2011
Assembly Passage
Sep 2011
Signed into Law
Oct 2011
Introduced Feb 18, 2011 Signed Oct 7, 2011
Floor votes · Senate Jun 1, 2011 · Assembly Sep 8, 2011

How they voted

29–7
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 39
Jun 1, 2011
D Democratic24
24 Yea
100% Yea
R Republican15
5 Yea 7 Nay 3
46% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
34
Key actions
8
Committee
5
Amendments
4
Oct 7, 2011
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 9, 2011
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 33. Noes 6. Page 2450.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Sep 8, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (66-12-1)
assembly
Sep 8, 2011
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Aug 26, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (August 25).
lower
Aug 17, 2011
Committee
Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Jul 1, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 13. Noes 2.) (June 27).
lower
Jun 9, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on U. & C.
lower
Jun 1, 2011
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (29-7-3)
senate
May 26, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 2. Page 1121.) (May 26).
upper
May 4, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0. Page 808.) (April 28).
upper
Mar 3, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on E., U., & C.
upper
Feb 18, 2011
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
ML
Mark Leno
DDemocratic
CA
11