Criminal procedure: informants.
Summary
Existing law provides that a conviction cannot be had upon the testimony of an accomplice unless that testimony is corroborated by such other evidence which tends to connect the defendant with the commission of the offense and that corroboration is not sufficient if it merely shows the commission of the offense or the circumstances thereof. This bill would additionally provide that a judge or jury may not enter a judgment of conviction upon a criminal defendant, find a special circumstance true, or use a fact in aggravation based solely on the uncorroborated testimony of an in-custody informant, as defined. The bill would provide that corroboration shall not be deemed sufficient if it merely shows the commission of the offense, the special circumstance, or the circumstance in aggravation. The bill would provide that the corroboration of an in-custody informant shall not be provided by the testimony of another in-custody informant.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Jun 2011
Senate Passage
May 2011
Assembly Passage
Jul 2011
Signed into Law
Aug 2011
Introduced Feb 18, 2011
Signed Aug 1, 2011
Floor votes · Senate May 2, 2011 · Assembly Jul 14, 2011
How they voted
21–12
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 35
May 2, 2011
D
Democratic23
91% Yea
R
Republican12
91% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
18
Key actions
5
Committee
4
Aug 1, 2011
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Jul 14, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (41-25-6)
assembly
Jun 14, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (June 14).
lower
May 9, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
May 2, 2011
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (21-12-2)
senate
Apr 5, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 544.) (April 5).
upper
Mar 3, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Feb 18, 2011
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
ML
Mark Leno
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 687
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 687. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline