Workers' compensation insurance: dispute resolution: arbitration clauses.
Summary
Existing law requires that a workers' compensation insurance policy or endorsement not be issued by an insurer unless the insurer files a copy of the form or endorsement with a rating organization and 30 days have expired from the date the form or endorsement is received by the Insurance Commissioner from the rating organization without notice from the commissioner, unless the commissioner gives written approval of the form or the endorsement prior to that time. This bill would require an insurer that intends to use a dispute resolution or arbitration agreement to resolve disputes arising in California out of a workers' compensation insurance policy or endorsement issued to a California employer, as defined, to disclose to the employer, contemporaneously with any written quote that offers to provide insurance coverage, that choice of law and choice of venue or forum may be a jurisdiction other than California and that these terms are negotiable between the insurer and the employer. The bill would require that the employer sign the disclosure, as evidence of receipt, when the employer accepts the offer of coverage. The bill would authorize the dispute resolution or arbitration agreement to be negotiated before any dispute arises. These provisions would apply to workers' compensation policies issued or renewed on or after July 1, 2012.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Sep 2011
Senate Passage
May 2011
Assembly Passage
Aug 2011
Signed into Law
Oct 2011
Introduced Feb 18, 2011
Signed Oct 7, 2011
Floor votes · Senate May 16, 2011 · Assembly Aug 31, 2011
How they voted
21–11
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 35
May 16, 2011
D
Democratic23
91% Yea
R
Republican12
83% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
33
Key actions
6
Committee
7
Amendments
2
Oct 7, 2011
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 1, 2011
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 24. Noes 15. Page 2243.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Aug 31, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (67-4-1)
assembly
Aug 31, 2011
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Jul 12, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (July 7).
lower
Jul 6, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 10. Noes 1.) (July 6). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Jun 27, 2011
Committee
Set, first hearing. Failed passage in committee. Reconsideration granted.
lower
May 27, 2011
Committee
Referred to Coms. on INS. and JUD.
lower
May 16, 2011
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (21-11-3)
senate
May 3, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Apr 6, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 3. Noes 2. Page 560.) (April 5). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Mar 3, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Feb 18, 2011
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Ellen Corbett
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 684
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 684. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline