SB 674 California Senate · 2011-2012 Regular Session

Telecommunications: master-metering: data security.

Summary
(1) The California High Speed Internet Access Act of 1999, among other things, requires the Public Utilities Commission to monitor and participate in a specified proceeding of the Federal Communications Commission addressing whether to require incumbent local exchange carriers, as defined, to permit interconnection by competitive data local exchange carriers, as defined, at any technically feasible point, to permit those competitive local exchange carriers to provide high bandwidth data services over telephone lines with voice services provided by incumbent local exchange carriers. This bill would repeal the California High Speed Internet Access Act of 1999. (2) Under existing law, the commission has regulatory authority over public utilities, including electrical corporations. An electrical corporation is defined as including every corporation or person owning, controlling, operating, or managing any electric plant for compensation within this state, except where electricity is generated on or distributed by the producer through private property solely for its own use or the use of its tenants and not for sale or transmission to others. Existing law requires that, when gas or electric service is provided by a master-meter customer to users who are tenants of a mobilehome park, apartment building, or similar residential complex, the master-meter customer charge each user a rate not to exceed the rate that would be applicable if the user were receiving gas or electricity, or both, directly from the gas or electrical corporation. Existing law creates further requirements for master-meter customers and for the corporations that provide service to them, including a requirement that a master-meter customer of a gas or electrical corporation who receives any rebate from the corporation to distribute to, or credit to the account of, each current user served by the master-meter customer a specified portion of the rebate. This bill would exclude from the definition of "rebate" the award of a monetary incentive under the California Solar Initiative for a solar energy system that provides electrical generation to a mobilehome park. (3) Existing law prohibits an electrical corporation or gas corporation from sharing, disclosing, or otherwise making accessible to any 3rd party a customer's electrical or gas consumption data, as defined, except as specified. Existing law provides that, if the electrical corporation or gas corporation contracts with a 3rd party for a service that allows a customer to monitor his or her electricity or gas usage, and the 3rd party uses the data for a secondary commercial purpose, the contract between the electrical or gas corporation and the 3rd party shall provide that the 3rd party prominently discloses that secondary commercial purpose to the customer. Existing law provides that nothing precludes an electrical corporation or gas corporation from disclosing a customer's electrical or gas consumption data to a 3rd party for system, grid, or operational needs, or the implementation of demand response, energy management, or energy efficiency programs, if the utility contract with the 3rd party, among other provisions relating to data security, prohibits the use of the data for a secondary commercial purpose not related to the primary purpose of the contract without the customer's consent. Existing law imposes a parallel prohibition, and parallel disclosure and consent requirements, on a local publicly owned electric utility. This bill would require those contracts to require prescribed customer consent prior to the use of the data.
Bill status signed all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Aug 2011
Senate Passage
May 2011
Assembly Passage
Aug 2011
Signed into Law
Sep 2011
Introduced Feb 18, 2011 Signed Sep 6, 2011
Floor votes · Senate Aug 22, 2011 · Assembly Aug 18, 2011

How they voted

36–0
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 39
Aug 22, 2011
D Democratic24
23 Yea 1
95% Yea
R Republican15
13 Yea 2
86% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
29
Key actions
8
Committee
9
Amendments
2
Sep 6, 2011
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 22, 2011
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (36-0-3)
senate
Aug 22, 2011
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 37. Noes 0. Page 2004.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Aug 18, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (73-0-6)
assembly
Aug 18, 2011
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Jul 13, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (July 13).
lower
Jun 28, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (June 28). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 22, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (June 20). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Jun 2, 2011
Committee
Referred to Coms. on U. & C. and JUD.
lower
May 17, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and ordered to consent calendar.
upper
May 4, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 765.) (April 26).
upper
Apr 5, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 11. Noes 0. Page 542.) (April 5). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Mar 22, 2011
Upper · Passed
Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Mar 3, 2011
Committee
Referred to Coms. on E., U., & C. and JUD.
upper
Feb 18, 2011
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Photo of Alex Padilla
Alex Padilla
DDemocratic
CA
20