SB 654 California Senate · 2011-2012 Regular Session

Redevelopment.

Summary
Existing law suspends various activities of redevelopment agencies and prohibits the agencies from incurring indebtedness for a specified period. Existing law also dissolves redevelopment agencies and community development agencies, as of October 1, 2011, and designates successor agencies, as defined. Existing law requires successor agencies to wind down the affairs of the dissolved redevelopment agencies and to, among other things, repay enforceable obligations, as defined, and to remit unencumbered balances of redevelopment agency funds, including housing funds, to the county auditor-controller for distribution to taxing entities. Existing law authorizes the city, county, or city and county that authorized the creation of a redevelopment agency to retain the housing assets, functions, and powers previously performed by the redevelopment agency, excluding amounts on deposit in the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund. This bill would revise the definition of the term "enforceable obligation" and modify provisions relating to the transfer of housing funds and responsibilities associated with dissolved redevelopment agencies. The bill would provide that any amounts on deposit in the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund of a dissolved redevelopment agency be transferred to specified entities. The bill would make conforming changes. Existing law provides that upon a specified date, agreements, contracts, or arrangements between the city or county, or city and county that created the redevelopment agency and the redevelopment agency are invalid. Notwithstanding this provision, an agreement that provided loans or other startup funds for the agency that was entered into within 2 years of the formation of the agency is valid and binds the successor agency. The bill would expand this exception to include an agreement involving a loan specific to a project area and other specified obligations.
Bill status passed 3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Apr 2012
Senate Passage
Jan 2012
Assembly Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 18, 2011 Last action Apr 16, 2012
Floor votes · Senate Jan 31, 2012

How they voted

291
Passed · 5 other
Total votes 35
Jan 31, 2012
D Democratic23
22 Yea 1
95% Yea
R Republican12
7 Yea 1 Nay 4
58% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
21
Key actions
3
Committee
4
Amendments
3
Apr 16, 2012
Committee
Referred to Coms. on H. & C.D. and L. GOV.
lower
Jan 31, 2012
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (29-1-5)
senate
Jan 31, 2012
Introduced
Amended pursuant to Joint Rule 23.5. (Page 2745.)
upper
Jan 31, 2012
Introduced
Amendments by Senator Huff tabled on motion of Senator Corbett. (Ayes 24. Noes 12. Page 2743.)
upper
Jan 19, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 8. Noes 0. Page 2686.) (January 19).
upper
Jan 11, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0. Page 2641.) (January 10).
upper
Jan 4, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on T. & H.
upper
Mar 3, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Feb 18, 2011
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Photo of Darrell Steinberg
Darrell Steinberg
DDemocratic
CA
6