Toxics: enforcement: lead and cadmium jewelry.
Summary
(1) Existing law prohibits the manufacturing, shipping, selling, or offering for sale of jewelry, as defined, for retail sale in the state, unless the jewelry is made entirely from specified materials. Existing law also prohibits any person from taking those actions with regard to children's jewelry, as defined, unless the children's jewelry is made entirely of specified materials. Existing law, for purposes of those provisions, defines among other terms, "amended consent judgment" and "jewelry." Existing law excludes a person who violates those prohibitions from the criminal penalties otherwise imposed pursuant to the hazardous waste control laws and instead provides that a person who violates those prohibitions is liable for a civil penalty not to exceed $2,500 per day for each violation. Existing law specifies that a party that is a signatory to an amended consent judgment, or a party to a consent judgment entered in a specified consolidation action that contains certain terms is deemed to be in compliance with those provisions. Existing law requires these collected civil penalties to be deposited in the Hazardous Waste Control Account, for expenditure by the Department of Toxic Substances Control, upon appropriation by the Legislature, to implement and enforce those prohibitions. This bill would delete those provisions defining the term "amended consent judgment," and those provisions specifying that a party that is a signatory to the above-described amended consent judgment or consent judgment enacted in a specified consolidation action is deemed to be in compliance with those provisions. The bill would also revise the definition of the term "jewelry." (2) Existing law requires a manufacturer or supplier to provide a specified certification to a person who sells or offers for sale that manufacturer's or supplier's jewelry, upon the request of that person, or to display the certification prominently on the shipping container or on the packaging of jewelry. This bill would instead require a manufacturer or supplier of jewelry that is sold, offered for sale, or offered for promotional purposes to prepare this certification and would delete the condition that the certification be provided on request, thereby requiring the manufacturer or supplier to either provide the certification to a person who sells or offers for sale that manufacturer's or supplier's jewelry or to display the certification prominently on the shipping container or on the packaging of jewelry. (3) Existing law imposes criminal penalties upon a manufacturer or supplier of jewelry who knowingly and intentionally manufactures, ships, sells, offers for sale, or offers for promotional purposes jewelry containing lead or cadmium in violation of those provisions or who knowingly and with intent to deceive falsifies any document or certificate required to be kept or produced pursuant to those provisions. This bill would impose a state-mandated local program by creating a new crime with regard to the sale, or offering for sale, of this jewelry and the preparation of the certification. (4) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Aug 2011
Senate Passage
Apr 2011
Assembly Passage
Aug 2011
Signed into Law
Oct 2011
Introduced Feb 18, 2011
Signed Oct 4, 2011
Floor votes · Senate Apr 14, 2011 · Assembly Aug 25, 2011
How they voted
26–5
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 35
Apr 14, 2011
D
Democratic23
86% Yea
R
Republican12
50% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
26
Key actions
6
Committee
5
Amendments
2
Oct 4, 2011
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 30, 2011
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 33. Noes 4. Page 2151.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Aug 25, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (43-23-6)
assembly
Aug 25, 2011
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Aug 18, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (August 17).
lower
Jun 29, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 2.) (June 28). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 28, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on E.S. & T.M.
lower
Apr 14, 2011
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (26-5-4)
senate
Apr 5, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 543.) (April 4).
upper
Mar 3, 2011
Committee
Referred to Coms. on E.Q. and JUD.
upper
Feb 18, 2011
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Fran Pavley
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 646
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 646. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline