Personal information: Internet disclosure prohibition.
Summary
Existing law authorizes victims of domestic violence or stalking and reproductive health care providers, employees, and volunteers, as defined, to complete an application to be approved by the Secretary of State for the purposes of enabling state and local agencies to respond to requests for public records without disclosing a program participant's residence address contained in any public record. Existing law prohibits the Secretary of State from making a program participant's address publicly available, except in specified circumstances, including when the participant's program certification has been canceled. This bill would specify, instead, that a participant's personal address may be revealed after termination of certification only if the participant's termination resulted from the program manager determining that false information was used as a subterfuge to avoid detection of illegal or criminal activity or apprehension by law enforcement. This bill would, for purposes of the program for victims of domestic violence or stalking, prohibit a person, business, or association from knowingly and intentionally publicly posting or displaying on the Internet, or soliciting, selling, or trading on the Internet, specified personal information of a program participant or other persons residing at the same address with a prescribed intent to cause great bodily harm or place a person in objectively reasonable fear for his or her personal safety. The bill would also prohibit a person, business, or association from intentionally publicly posting or displaying on the Internet specified personal information of a program participant or other persons residing at the same address if the participant has made a demand on the person, business, or association to not disclose that information, as specified. Violation of these provisions would be subject to specified civil penalties. The bill would prohibit a person from posting on the Internet the home address, the telephone number, or personal identifying information of a domestic violence or stalking victim program participant or the program participant's family members who are participating in the program, or a provider, employee, volunteer, or patient of a reproductive health facility or individual residing at the same address with the intent that another person imminently use that information to commit a crime involving violence or a threat of violence against the participant or the program participant's family members who are participating in the program. Violations of these provisions would be a crime, punishable as specified. By creating a new crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Aug 2011
Senate Passage
May 2011
Assembly Passage
Jul 2011
Signed into Law
Aug 2011
Introduced Feb 18, 2011
Signed Aug 31, 2011
Floor votes · Senate Aug 15, 2011 · Assembly Jul 14, 2011
How they voted
32–0
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 35
Aug 15, 2011
D
Democratic23
91% Yea
R
Republican12
91% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
32
Key actions
7
Committee
7
Amendments
2
Aug 31, 2011
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 15, 2011
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (32-0-3)
senate
Aug 15, 2011
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 37. Noes 0. Page 1911.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Jul 14, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (69-0-3)
assembly
Jul 14, 2011
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Jul 6, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (July 6).
lower
Jun 21, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (June 21).
lower
Jun 2, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
May 17, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
May 4, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 863.) (May 3). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 13, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. (Ayes 4. Noes 0. Page 642.) (April 12). Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Mar 3, 2011
Committee
Referred to Coms. on JUD. and PUB. S.
upper
Feb 18, 2011
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 4 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 636
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 636. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline