Marriage and family therapists.
Summary
Existing law provides for the licensure and regulation of marriage and family therapists by the Board of Behavioral Sciences. Existing law specifies the education required for licensure, which includes, for specified applicants, a requirement for a practicum that involves direct client contact and hours of experience relating to client-centered advocacy, as defined. Existing law authorizes trainees to perform activities and services in certain work settings provided that these constitute part of the trainee's supervised course of study and the person is designated as a trainee. Existing law also authorizes trainees to gain hours of experience outside the required practicum under certain conditions, but requires trainees who gain experience outside the required practicum to be enrolled in a practicum in order to counsel clients, except that trainees may counsel clients while not enrolled in a practicum if the period of lapsed enrollment is less than 90 calendar days, and if that period is immediately preceded and immediately followed by enrollment in a practicum course. Existing law specifies requirements of the degree program that an applicant must complete to be eligible for licensure. This bill would revise these provisions to allow trainees who begin graduate study before August 1, 2012, and complete that study on or before December 31, 2018, to gain experience and counsel clients outside of a practicum. The bill, with respect to certain trainees, including trainees who begin graduate study before August 1, 2012, and do not complete that study on or before December 31, 2018, would allow those trainees to gain experience and counsel clients outside of a practicum provided that the period of lapse is immediately preceded by enrollment in a practicum course and immediately followed by enrollment in a practicum course or completion of the degree program. Some of these provisions would operate retroactively from January 1, 2012, and the bill would state the intent of the Legislature in that regard. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Jun 2012
Senate Passage
Jan 2012
Assembly Passage
Jun 2012
Signed into Law
Jul 2012
Introduced Feb 18, 2011
Signed Jul 3, 2012
Floor votes · Senate Jan 26, 2012 · Assembly Jun 14, 2012
How they voted
30–0
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 31
Jan 26, 2012
D
Democratic20
100% Yea
R
Republican11
90% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
35
Key actions
7
Committee
7
Amendments
1
Jul 3, 2012
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Jun 18, 2012
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 36. Noes 0. Page 3955.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Jun 14, 2012
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (64-0-6)
assembly
Jun 14, 2012
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Jun 12, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (June 12).
lower
Apr 12, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on B., P. & C.P.
lower
Jan 26, 2012
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (30-0-1)
senate
Jan 10, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 8. Noes 0. Page 2622.) (January 9).
upper
May 2, 2011
Upper · Passed
Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Mar 31, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on B., P. & E.D.
upper
Mar 3, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Feb 18, 2011
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Bill Emmerson
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 632
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 632. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline