Local government: solar-use easement.
Summary
(1) Existing law, the Williamson Act, authorizes a city or county to enter into 10-year contracts with owners of land devoted to agricultural use, whereby the owners agree to continue using the property for that purpose, and the city or county agrees to value the land accordingly for purposes of property taxation. Existing law authorizes the parties to a Williamson Act contract to mutually agree to rescind a contract under the act in order to simultaneously enter into an open-space easement for a certain period of years. This bill would authorize the parties to a Williamson Act contract, after approval by the Department of Conservation, in consultation with the Department of Food and Agriculture, to mutually agree to rescind the contract in order to simultaneously enter into a solar-use easement that would require that the land be used for solar photovoltaic facilities for a term no less than 20 years, except as specified. The bill would require the city or county to charge the property owner a rescission fee based upon the fair market value of the property at the time of the rescission, as specified. This bill would require a city or county to include certain, and authorizes a city or county to include other, restrictions, conditions, or covenants in the deed or instrument granting a solar-use easement. This bill would provide that a solar-use easement would be automatically renewed annually, unless either party filed a notice of nonrenewal. This bill would provide that a solar-use easement may only be extinguished on all or a portion of the parcel by nonrenewal, termination, or by returning the land to its previous contract under the Williamson Act. This bill would require that if the landowner extinguishes the contract either by filing a notice of nonrenewal or by terminating the solar-use easement, the landowner shall restore the property to the conditions that existed before the easement by the time the easement terminates. This bill would authorize a landowner to terminate a solar-use easement by complying with certain procedures, and paying a termination fee based upon the termination value of the property, as determined by the county assessor. This bill would provide that specified parties may bring an action to enforce the easement if it is violated. (2) Existing law requires the county assessor to consider, when valuing real property for property taxation purposes, the effect of any enforceable restrictions to which the use of the land may be subjected. Under existing law these restrictions include, but are not limited to, zoning, recorded contracts with governmental agencies, and various other restrictions imposed by governments. This bill would also require the county assessor to consider, when valuing real property for property taxation purposes, solar-use easements. By changing the manner in which county assessors assess property for property taxation purposes, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (3) The Natural Community Conservation Planning Act defines "covered species" for purposes of the act to mean those species, both listed and nonlisted pursuant to the California Endangered Species Act conserved and managed under an approved natural community conservation plan and that may be authorized for take. The act further authorizes the department to, prior to approval of a conservation plan, authorize by permit the taking of any covered species whose conservation and management is provided for in a natural community conservation plan approved by the department. This bill would revise the definition of "covered species" to include fully protected species, as specified, and would make conforming changes. The bill would also include specified fully protected species in the species authorized to be taken prior to the approval of a conservation plan. (4) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Sep 2011
Senate Passage
Jun 2011
Assembly Passage
Sep 2011
Signed into Law
Oct 2011
Introduced Feb 18, 2011
Signed Oct 8, 2011
Floor votes · Senate Sep 10, 2011 · Assembly Sep 10, 2011
How they voted
27–1
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 31
Sep 10, 2011
D
Democratic20
95% Yea
R
Republican11
72% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
41
Key actions
8
Committee
9
Amendments
4
Oct 8, 2011
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 10, 2011
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (27-1-3)
senate
Sep 10, 2011
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 35. Noes 1. Page 2486.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Sep 9, 2011
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Sep 9, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (September 9).
lower
Sep 6, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.
lower
Aug 29, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (August 25).
lower
Aug 17, 2011
Committee
Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Jul 5, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (June 29).
lower
Jun 23, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on AGRI. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (June 22). Re-referred to Com. on AGRI.
lower
Jun 15, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Coms. on L. GOV. and AGRI.
lower
Jun 13, 2011
Committee
Referred to Coms. on AGRI. and L. GOV.
lower
May 26, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 8. Noes 0. Page 1120.) (May 26).
upper
May 2, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0. Page 762.) (April 27).
upper
Mar 3, 2011
Committee
Referred to Coms. on GOV. & F. and APPR.
upper
Feb 18, 2011
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 3 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Lois Wolk
DDemocratic
Co
Cathleen Galgiani
DDemocratic
Co
Luis Alejo
DDemocratic
Co
VM
V. Manuel Pérez
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 618
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 618. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline