SB 616 California Senate · 2011-2012 Regular Session

Controlled substances: reporting.

Summary
Existing law classifies certain controlled substances into designated schedules. Existing law requires the Department of Justice to maintain the Controlled Substance Utilization Review and Evaluation System (CURES) for the electronic monitoring of the prescribing and dispensing of Schedule II, Schedule III, and Schedule IV controlled substances by all practitioners authorized to prescribe or dispense these controlled substances. Existing law requires dispensing pharmacies and clinics to report, on a weekly basis, specified information for each prescription of Schedule II, Schedule III, or Schedule IV controlled substances, to the department, as specified. This bill would establish the CURES Fund within the State Treasury to receive funds to be allocated, upon appropriation by the Legislature, to the Department of Justice for the purposes of funding CURES, and would make related findings and declarations. This bill would, if insufficient funds exist to cover operational costs of CURES or a permanent and ongoing funding source is not identified for CURES, require the Medical Board of California, the Dental Board of California, the California State Board of Pharmacy, the Veterinary Medical Board, the Board of Registered Nursing, the Physician Assistant Committee of the Medical Board of California, the Osteopathic Medical Board of California, the State Board of Optometry, and the California Board of Podiatric Medicine to increase the licensure, certification, and renewal fees charged to practitioners under their supervision who are authorized to prescribe or dispense controlled substances by up to $10 annually, the proceeds of which would be deposited into the CURES Fund for support of CURES, as specified.
Bill status died 4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Aug 2012
Senate Passage
Jan 2012
Assembly Passage
Aug 2012
Governor
Introduced Feb 18, 2011 Last action Aug 29, 2012
Floor votes · Senate Jan 17, 2012 · Assembly Aug 24, 2012

How they voted

36–0
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 39
Jan 17, 2012
D Democratic24
23 Yea 1
95% Yea
R Republican15
13 Yea 2
86% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
39
Key actions
6
Committee
10
Amendments
1
Aug 29, 2012
Committee
Set, first hearing. Failed passage in committee.
lower
Aug 27, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Coms. on B.,P. & C.P. and APPR. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.
lower
Aug 24, 2012
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (50-25-4)
assembly
Jul 3, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (July 3).
lower
Jun 25, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Jan 17, 2012
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (36-0-3)
senate
Jan 11, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 9. Noes 0. Page 2640.) (January 10).
upper
Jan 5, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on T. & H.
upper
Jan 4, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
May 26, 2011
Upper · Passed
Held in committee and under submission.
upper
Apr 25, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 675.) (April 13).
upper
Mar 31, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
upper
Mar 3, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Feb 18, 2011
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Photo of Mark DeSaulnier
Mark DeSaulnier
DDemocratic
CA
7