Wiretapping: authorization.
Summary
Existing law establishes a procedure for the application for, and issuance of, an order authorizing the interception of a wire, electronic pager, or electronic cellular telephone communication, as those terms are defined, and, among other things, establishes additional provisions regarding those interceptions for purposes of criminal proceedings. Existing law requires the Attorney General to prepare and submit an annual report to the Legislature, the Judicial Council, and the Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Court regarding these interceptions, as specified. The report is required to include, among other things, a general description of the interceptions made under the order or extension, including the approximate nature and frequency of incriminating communications intercepted, the approximate nature and frequency of other communications intercepted, the approximate number of persons whose communications were intercepted, and the approximate nature, amount, and cost of the manpower and other resources used in the interceptions. Existing law provides that a violation of these provisions is punishable as a misdemeanor with specified penalties, or as a felony. Existing law further provides that all of these provisions shall remain in effect until January 1, 2012. This bill would extend the operation of these provisions until January 1, 2015. This bill would further revise the reporting requirement to require the report to include, among other things, a general description of the interceptions made under the order or extension, including the number of persons whose communications were intercepted, the number of communications intercepted, the percentage of incriminating communications intercepted and the percentage of other communications intercepted, and the approximate nature, amount, and cost of the manpower and other resources used in the interceptions. By extending the operation of provisions of law creating a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Dec 2010
Committee Review
Sep 2011
Senate Passage
Jun 2011
Assembly Passage
Sep 2011
Signed into Law
Oct 2011
Introduced Dec 22, 2010
Signed Oct 9, 2011
Floor votes · Senate Sep 9, 2011 · Assembly Sep 8, 2011
How they voted
39–0
Passed
Total votes 39
Sep 9, 2011
D
Democratic24
100% Yea
R
Republican15
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
28
Key actions
6
Committee
7
Amendments
2
Oct 9, 2011
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 9, 2011
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (39-0)
senate
Sep 8, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (77-0-2)
assembly
Sep 8, 2011
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 40. Noes 0. Page 2406.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Sep 7, 2011
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Aug 26, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (August 25).
lower
Jul 7, 2011
Committee
Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Jun 22, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 21). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 13, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
May 26, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 8. Noes 0. Page 1112.) (May 26).
upper
Mar 22, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 417.) (March 22). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jan 20, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Dec 22, 2010
Introduced
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Fran Pavley
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 61
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 61. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline