Life insurance: retained-asset account.
Summary
Existing law provides that life insurance may be made payable, among other things, on the death of the insured, on his or her surviving for a specified period of time, or periodically as long as he or she lives. This bill would require that all life insurance benefits be paid in the form of a lump-sum payment to the beneficiary or by another settlement option that is clearly described in the claim form. If the beneficiary does not choose one of the available settlement options, a retained-asset account would be authorized to be the default option only if the claim form provides a prominent disclosure, as prescribed, that in the absence of a choice by the beneficiary, payment of policy benefits would be made through establishment of a retained-asset account on the beneficiary's behalf. Any life insurance benefits settlement an insurer offers or recommends, other than for a lump-sum payment, would be required to conform to specified conditions. The bill would authorize the Insurance Commissioner to adopt regulations specifying reasonable requirements for the form of agreements entered into and written disclosures provided by these provisions. The bill would only become operative if SB 713 of the 2011–12 Regular Session is enacted and becomes effective.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Sep 2011
Senate Passage
May 2011
Assembly Passage
Aug 2011
Signed into Law
Oct 2011
Introduced Feb 17, 2011
Signed Oct 2, 2011
Floor votes · Senate May 19, 2011 · Assembly Aug 31, 2011
How they voted
36–1
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 39
May 19, 2011
D
Democratic24
95% Yea
R
Republican15
86% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
37
Key actions
9
Committee
9
Amendments
2
Oct 2, 2011
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 1, 2011
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 36. Noes 0. Page 2242.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Aug 31, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (77-0-2)
assembly
Aug 31, 2011
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Aug 18, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (August 17).
lower
Jun 27, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (June 22).
lower
Jun 16, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on INS.
lower
May 19, 2011
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (36-1-2)
senate
May 17, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
May 4, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 860.) (May 3). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 28, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 5. Noes 3. Page 808.) (April 27). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Apr 12, 2011
Upper · Passed
Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Mar 17, 2011
Upper · Passed
Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Mar 3, 2011
Committee
Referred to Coms. on INS. and JUD.
upper
Feb 17, 2011
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 2 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
CK
Christine Kehoe
DDemocratic
Co
CD
Curren D Price
DDemocratic
Co
Ted Lieu
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 599
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 599. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline