Recycling: polystyrene food containers.
Summary
Existing law requires all rigid plastic bottles and rigid plastic containers sold in the state to be labeled with a code that indicates the resin used to produce the rigid plastic bottle or rigid plastic container. The California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989, administered by the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery, requires every rigid plastic packaging container, as defined, sold or offered for sale in this state to generally meet one of specified criteria. This bill would prohibit a food vendor, on and after January 1, 2016, from dispensing prepared food to a customer in a polystyrene foam food container and would define related terms. The bill would provide that a food vendor that is a school district is not required to comply with the bill's requirements until July 1, 2017, and would allow a food vendor that is a school district to dispense prepared food to a customer in a polystyrene foam food container after that date if the governing board of the school district elects to adopt a policy to implement a verifiable recycling program for polystyrene foam food containers, which would be renewable, as specified. The bill would also allow a food vendor to dispense prepared food to a customer in a polystyrene foam food container after January 1, 2016, in a city or county if the city or county elects to adopt an ordinance establishing a specified recycling program for polystyrene foam food containers, which would be operative, as specified. The bill would allow a food vendor to dispense prepared food to a customer in a polystyrene foam food container in a city or county if that food vendor demonstrates to the satisfaction of the city or county that compliance with the requirements of the bill would impose an undue economic hardship, as defined. The bill would authorize a city or county to exempt the food vendor until January 1, 2017, or for a period of not more than one year from the date of the demonstration, and would allow a food vendor to reapply for additional one-year exemptions from the bill's requirements.
Bill status
failed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Aug 2011
Senate Passage
Jun 2011
Assembly Failed
Aug 2012
Governor
Introduced Feb 17, 2011
Last action Sep 1, 2012
Floor votes · Assembly Aug 31, 2012
How they voted
21–42
Failed · 7 other
Total votes 70
Aug 31, 2012
D
Democratic44
47% Yea
R
Republican26
96% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
32
Key actions
3
Committee
6
Amendments
1
Aug 31, 2012
Vote failed
Assembly Vote: fail (21-42-7)
assembly
Aug 26, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 9. Noes 5.) (August 25).
lower
Aug 17, 2011
Committee
Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Jul 14, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jul 11, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 6. Noes 3.) (June 27).
lower
Jun 13, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
lower
Apr 5, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 543.) (April 4).
upper
Mar 3, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on E.Q.
upper
Feb 17, 2011
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
0 primary · 4 co-sponsors
Sponsors
No sponsor information available.
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 568
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 568. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline