Internet crimes: data collection.
Summary
Existing law requires specified local entities, including district attorneys and sheriffs, to install and maintain records needed for the correct reporting of statistical data and to report that data to the Attorney General at those times, and in a manner, prescribed by the Attorney General. This bill would, until January 1, 2015, require the Alameda County District Attorney's Office and the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department to collect statistical data on arrests or prosecutions involving private information, as defined, gathered from the Internet that was used in furtherance of a crime within each participating entity's jurisdiction. The bill would require the reporting of the statistical information to the Department of Justice in a prescribed manner on or before July 1, 2013, and January 1, 2014. The bill would require the Department of Justice to publish the information reported to it on the department's Internet Web site. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the Alameda County District Attorney and the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Aug 2012
Senate Passage
Aug 2012
Assembly Passage
Aug 2012
Signed into Law
Sep 2012
Introduced Feb 17, 2011
Signed Sep 13, 2012
Floor votes · Senate Apr 25, 2011 · Assembly Aug 21, 2012
How they voted
23–12
Passed
Total votes 35
Apr 25, 2011
D
Democratic23
100% Yea
R
Republican12
100% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
38
Key actions
8
Committee
7
Amendments
4
Sep 13, 2012
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 23, 2012
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 38. Noes 0. Page 4759.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Aug 21, 2012
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (69-0-3)
assembly
Aug 21, 2012
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Jul 3, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Jul 2, 2012
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Jun 26, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (June 19).
lower
Jun 21, 2011
Lower · Passed
Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Jun 13, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Coms. on JUD. and H. & C.D.
lower
Jun 9, 2011
Lower · Passed
Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
May 16, 2011
Committee
Referred to Coms. on H. & C.D. and JUD.
lower
Apr 25, 2011
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (23-12)
senate
Apr 11, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 4. Noes 1. Page 560.) (April 5).
upper
Mar 3, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Feb 17, 2011
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Ellen Corbett
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 561
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 561. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline