Elder and dependent adults: abuse or neglect: damages.
Summary
Existing law provides for the award of attorney's fees and costs to, and the recovery of damages by a plaintiff when it is proven by clear and convincing evidence that a defendant is liable for physical abuse or neglect of an elder or dependent adult and the defendant has also been guilty of recklessness, oppression, fraud, or malice in the commission of the abuse. This bill would revise these provisions to change the standard of proof to a preponderance of the evidence. Existing law authorizes a plaintiff to recover damages for the sake of example and by way of punishing the defendant in addition to the actual damages. Existing law provides that an employer is not liable for punitive damages based on the acts of an employee unless certain conditions are satisfied. Existing law requires that these conditions regarding the imposition of punitive damages on an employer based upon the acts of an employee be satisfied before any damages or attorney's fees permitted due to liability for physical abuse or neglect of an elder or dependent adult are authorized to be imposed against an employer. This bill would instead require that these conditions regarding the imposition of punitive damages on an employer be satisfied before any punitive damages may be imposed against an employer found liable for physical abuse, as defined, or neglect, as defined. This bill would state that these provisions are not intended to affect the specified standard of proof for punitive damages.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Aug 2011
Senate Passage
Jun 2011
Assembly Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 17, 2011
Last action Aug 25, 2011
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
23
Key actions
3
Committee
8
Amendments
1
Aug 25, 2011
Lower · Passed
Set, second hearing. Held in committee and under submission.
lower
Jul 13, 2011
Committee
Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Jun 21, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 3.) (June 21). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 9, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
May 26, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 2. Page 1119.) (May 26).
upper
May 19, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
May 11, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
May 2, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 3. Noes 2. Page 765.) (April 26).
upper
Mar 3, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Feb 17, 2011
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Joseph Simitian
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 558
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 558. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline