SB 557 California Senate · 2011-2012 Regular Session

Family justice centers.

Summary
Existing law provides for various services and programs to assist victims of crime, including grants to proposed and existing child sexual exploitation and child abuse victim counseling centers and prevention programs, and the establishment of a resource center to operate a statewide, toll-free information service consisting of legal information for crime victims and providers of services to crime victims. This bill would authorize the Cities of San Diego and Anaheim, and the Counties of Alameda and Sonoma, until January 1, 2014, to establish a multiagency, multidisciplinary family justice center to assist victims of domestic violence, officer-involved domestic violence, sexual assault, elder or dependent adult abuse, stalking, cyberstalking, cyberbullying, and human trafficking, to ensure that victims of abuse are able to access all needed services in one location and to enhance victim safety, increase offender accountability, and improve access to services for victims of crime, as provided. The bill would permit the family justice centers to be staffed by law enforcement, medical, social service, and child welfare personnel, among others. This bill would require each family justice center to consult with community-based crime victim agencies, survivors of violence and abuse, and their advocates in the operation of the family justice center and to develop a procedure for input, feedback, and evaluation of the family justice center. The bill would prohibit victims of crime from being denied services at a family justice center on the grounds of criminal history and would prohibit a criminal history search from being conducted without the victim's written consent, unless the criminal history search is pursuant to an active criminal investigation. The bill would require each family justice center to develop policies and procedures to ensure coordinated services are provided and to enhance the safety of victims and professionals at the family justice centers, as specified. The bill would require each family justice center to maintain an informed consent policy and to be in compliance with all state and federal laws protecting the confidentiality of the types of information and documents that may be in a victim's file. The bill would require the National Family Justice Center Alliance, with private funds, to contract with an independent organization to conduct an evaluation and prepare a report on the family justice centers, as specified. The bill would require the independent organization to submit the report to the Office of Privacy Protection and the National Family Justice Center Alliance for review and comment, and then submit the report to the Assembly Committee on Judiciary, the Senate Committee on Judiciary, the Assembly Committee on Public Safety, and the Senate Committee on Public Safety, no later than January 1, 2013. This bill would allow the National Family Justice Center Alliance to submit recommendations for statewide legislation, best practices, and model policies and procedures in its comments to the independent evaluation organization. The bill would require each family justice center to maintain a formal training program with mandatory training for all staff members, volunteers, and agency professionals, as specified.
Bill status signed all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Aug 2011
Senate Passage
Jun 2011
Assembly Passage
Jul 2011
Signed into Law
Sep 2011
Introduced Feb 17, 2011 Signed Sep 6, 2011
Floor votes · Senate Jun 1, 2011 · Assembly Jul 14, 2011

How they voted

38–0
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 39
Jun 1, 2011
D Democratic24
24 Yea
100% Yea
R Republican15
14 Yea 1
93% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
34
Key actions
8
Committee
6
Amendments
5
Sep 6, 2011
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 22, 2011
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 34. Noes 0. Page 2017.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Jul 14, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (75-0-4)
assembly
Jul 14, 2011
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Jul 6, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (June 28).
lower
Jun 22, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 21). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Jun 9, 2011
Committee
Referred to Coms. on PUB. S. and JUD.
lower
Jun 1, 2011
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (38-0-1)
senate
May 26, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 9. Noes 0. Page 1119.) (May 26).
upper
May 25, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
May 19, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
May 16, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 950.) (May 10).
upper
Apr 4, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 6. Noes 0. Page 495.) (March 29).
upper
Mar 3, 2011
Committee
Referred to Coms. on PUB. S. and JUD.
upper
Feb 17, 2011
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
CK
Christine Kehoe
DDemocratic
CA
39