Public school performance accountability.
Summary
(1) Existing law requires the Superintendent of Public Instruction, with the approval of the State Board of Education, to develop an Academic Performance Index (API) , consisting of specified indicators, to measure the performance of schools and pupils. This bill would make these provisions inoperative on July 1, 2014, and repeal them as of January 1, 2015. The bill would require the Superintendent, in consultation with a specified advisory committee, to develop an Education Quality Index (EQI) , which would replace the API and consist of a State Assessment Index, a Graduation Rate Index, a College Preparedness Index, and a Career Readiness Index. The bill would require that these indices consist of specified criteria. In developing the EQI, the Superintendent and this advisory committee would be required to consult with the University of California, the California State University, the California Community Colleges, the Employment Development Department, and other appropriate entities. The bill would require the state board to provide opportunities for public input, make changes as necessary, and adopt the EQI no later than August 1, 2014. Commencing with the 2014–15 school year, the bill would require that all schools and school districts be evaluated using an EQI value. The bill would require the Superintendent to report to the Governor and the appropriate policy and fiscal committees of the Legislature by July 1, 2013, and annually thereafter, specified information relating to the creation of additional indices. The bill also would require the Superintendent, in consultation with a specified advisory committee, and subject to an appropriation in the annual Budget Act or another statute for this purpose, to contract for an independent evaluation of the effectiveness and reliability of the EQI and any statutory changes recommended for improvement, and to submit the evaluation and recommendations in a report to the Governor and the appropriate policy and fiscal committees of the Legislature by July 1, 2018. To the extent that this bill would impose new duties on school districts in connection with the establishment of the EQI, including, but not limited to, new reporting duties, it would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill would also make conforming and clarifying changes relating to the duties of a specified advisory committee. The bill would require this advisory committee, for purposes of work relating to the EQI, to seek input through the establishment of subcommittees or other methods from persons with expertise in various areas, and, commencing January 1, 2012, through July 1, 2016, to hold a public meeting at least once each quarter per year. (2) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Sep 2011
Senate Passage
Jun 2011
Assembly Passage
Sep 2011
Vetoed
Mar 2012
Introduced Feb 17, 2011
Vetoed Mar 1, 2012
Floor votes · Senate Jun 1, 2011 · Assembly Sep 2, 2011
How they voted
23–11
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 35
Jun 1, 2011
D
Democratic23
100% Yea
R
Republican12
91% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
36
Key actions
7
Committee
6
Amendments
4
Mar 1, 2012
Vetoed
Veto sustained.
upper
Mar 1, 2012
Vetoed
Consideration of Governor's veto stricken from file.
upper
Oct 8, 2011
Vetoed
In Senate. Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
upper
Oct 8, 2011
Vetoed
Vetoed by the Governor.
upper
Sep 9, 2011
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 30. Noes 7. Page 2468.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Sep 2, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (47-21-4)
assembly
Sep 2, 2011
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Aug 26, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (August 25).
lower
Aug 17, 2011
Committee
Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Jul 12, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 3.) (July 6).
lower
Jun 9, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
lower
Jun 1, 2011
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (23-11-1)
senate
May 26, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 2. Page 1119.) (May 26).
upper
May 3, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 3. Page 760.) (April 27).
upper
Mar 31, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on ED.
upper
Mar 3, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Feb 17, 2011
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 3 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Darrell Steinberg
DDemocratic
Co
CD
Curren D Price
DDemocratic
Co
JS
Jose Solorio
DDemocratic
Co
WT
Warren T Furutani
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 547
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 547. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline