Regulatory boards: expert consultants.
Summary
Existing law provides for the licensure and regulation of various professions and vocations by boards within the Department of Consumer Affairs. Existing law, the Chiropractic Act, enacted by initiative, provides for the licensure and regulation of chiropractors by the State Board of Chiropractic Examiners. Existing law, the Osteopathic Act, requires the Osteopathic Medical Board of California to regulate osteopathic physicians and surgeons. Existing law generally requires applicants for a license to pass an examination and authorizes boards to take disciplinary action against licensees for violations of law. Existing law establishes standards relating to personal service contracts in state employment. This bill would authorize these boards to enter into an agreement with an expert consultant, subject to the standards regarding personal service contracts described above, to provide enforcement and examination assistance. The bill would require each board to establish policies and procedures for the selection and use of these consultants. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Sep 2011
Senate Passage
May 2011
Assembly Passage
Aug 2011
Signed into Law
Sep 2011
Introduced Feb 17, 2011
Signed Sep 26, 2011
Floor votes · Senate Sep 6, 2011 · Assembly Aug 25, 2011
How they voted
39–0
Passed
Total votes 39
Sep 6, 2011
D
Democratic24
100% Yea
R
Republican15
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
28
Key actions
7
Committee
8
Amendments
1
Sep 26, 2011
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 6, 2011
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (39-0)
senate
Sep 6, 2011
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 40. Noes 0. Page 2318.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Aug 25, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (77-0-2)
assembly
Aug 25, 2011
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Aug 18, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (August 17).
lower
Jun 28, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (June 28). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 2, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on B., P. & C.P.
lower
May 17, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
May 3, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 0. Page 848.) (May 2). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 11, 2011
Upper · Passed
Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Mar 3, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on B., P. & E.D.
upper
Feb 17, 2011
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
CD
Curren D Price
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 541
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 541. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline