Victims of sexual assault.
Summary
(1) Existing law provides that no costs incurred by a qualified health care professional, hospital, or other emergency medical facility for the examination of the victim of a sexual assault for the purposes of gathering evidence for possible prosecution shall be charged directly or indirectly to the victim of the assault. Existing law provides that the law enforcement agency in the jurisdiction in which the alleged sexual assault was committed which requests the examination has the option of determining whether or not the examination will be performed in the office of a physician and surgeon, and bills for those costs shall be submitted to that local jurisdiction and the local jurisdiction shall bear those costs. This bill would delete the provision giving the local law enforcement agency the option of whether or not the examination will be performed in the office of a physician and surgeon. The bill would provide that victims of sexual assault who request a medical evidentiary examination shall be provided with one. The bill would provide that the victim is not required to participate in the criminal justice system, as specified. The bill would provide that the cost of the medical evidentiary examination is not chargeable, directly or indirectly, to the victim. The bill would provide that the cost of that examination is a cost chargeable to the local law enforcement agency in whose jurisdiction the alleged offense occurred, provided however, that the local law enforcement agency may seek reimbursement from the California Emergency Management Agency for the costs of those examinations, as specified, in those cases in which the victim does not participate in the criminal justice system. The bill would provide that the amount that a qualified health care professional, hospital, or other emergency medical facility may charge to perform the medical evidentiary examination portion of a medical examination of a victim of sexual assault may not exceed $300, and would specify certain federal grant moneys to be used by the California Emergency Management Agency for reimbursement to local law enforcement agencies for the cost of medical evidentiary examinations, as specified, in those cases where the victim does not participate in the criminal justice system. The bill would authorize the agency to use those federal funds for that purpose until January 1, 2014. This bill would make related conforming changes. (2) Existing law requires the California Emergency Management Agency to develop a course of training for qualified health care professionals relating to the examination and treatment of victims of sexual assault. Existing law requires that the agency consult with health care professionals and law enforcement agencies in developing the course. This bill would encourage the agency to designate a course of training for qualified health care professionals and require the agency to partner with allied professional training courses, such as sexual assault prosecutor training as administered by the California District Attorneys Association, regarding that course of training, as specified. (3) For purposes of these provisions, existing law defines a qualified health care professional as a licensed physician and surgeon, or a nurse who works in consultation with a physician and surgeon who conducts examinations for victims of sexual abuse. This bill would include a currently licensed nurse practitioner and a currently licensed physician assistant in the definition of a qualified health care professional.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Sep 2011
Senate Passage
Jun 2011
Assembly Passage
Aug 2011
Signed into Law
Sep 2011
Introduced Feb 17, 2011
Signed Sep 29, 2011
Floor votes · Senate Jun 2, 2011 · Assembly Aug 31, 2011
How they voted
34–0
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 35
Jun 2, 2011
D
Democratic23
100% Yea
R
Republican12
91% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
31
Key actions
8
Committee
6
Amendments
4
Sep 29, 2011
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 1, 2011
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 35. Noes 0. Page 2241.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Aug 31, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (70-0-2)
assembly
Aug 31, 2011
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Aug 26, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (August 25).
lower
Aug 17, 2011
Committee
Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Jun 27, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 21).
lower
Jun 13, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Jun 2, 2011
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (34-0-1)
senate
May 31, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 9. Noes 0. Page 1118.) (May 26).
upper
Apr 6, 2011
Upper · Passed
Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Mar 29, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0. Page 495.) (March 29). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Mar 3, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Feb 17, 2011
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 3 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Ellen Corbett
DDemocratic
Co
CL
Carol Liu
DDemocratic
Co
CD
Curren D Price
DDemocratic
Co
Loni Hancock
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 534
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 534. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline