Sign Up
SB 503 California Senate · 2011-2012 Regular Session

Judges' retirement.

Summary
The Judges' Retirement System II Law authorizes any judge to elect, by written election filed with the board at any time prior to retirement, to make contributions, and receive service credit for, all of the time he or she served as a full-time subordinate judicial officer, prior to becoming a judge, excluding any period of time for which the judge is receiving, or is entitled to receive, a retirement allowance from any other public retirement system. This bill would limit that written election to a one-time written election. The bill would also authorize the judge to make contributions to, and receive service credit for, any number of whole years or all of the time he or she served as a full-time subordinate judicial officer.
Bill status vetoed 4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Sep 2011
Senate Passage
Aug 2011
Assembly Passage
Sep 2011
Vetoed
Mar 2012
Introduced Feb 17, 2011 Vetoed Mar 1, 2012
Floor votes · Senate Sep 9, 2011 · Assembly Sep 8, 2011

How they voted

30–1
Passed
Total votes 31
Sep 9, 2011
D Democratic20
20 Yea
100% Yea
R Republican11
10 Yea 1 Nay
90% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
39
Key actions
7
Committee
10
Amendments
2
Mar 1, 2012
Vetoed
Veto sustained.
upper
Mar 1, 2012
Vetoed
Consideration of Governor's veto stricken from file.
upper
Oct 9, 2011
Vetoed
In Senate. Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
upper
Oct 9, 2011
Vetoed
Vetoed by the Governor.
upper
Sep 9, 2011
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (30-1)
senate
Sep 8, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (55-6-9)
assembly
Sep 8, 2011
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 38. Noes 2. Page 2413.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Sep 7, 2011
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Aug 31, 2011
Upper · Passed
Action rescinded whereby the bill was read a third time, passed, and ordered to Senate.
upper
Aug 23, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: That the Assembly amendments not be concurred in. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 2032.)
upper
Aug 22, 2011
Committee
From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on P.E. & R. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10. (Ayes 3. Noes 0. Page 2006.) Re-referred to Com. on P.E. & R.
upper
Aug 22, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10.
upper
Aug 18, 2011
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Jul 13, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (July 13).
lower
Jun 8, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (June 8). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 19, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on P.E., R. & S.S.
lower
May 3, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and ordered to consent calendar.
upper
Apr 12, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 620.) (April 11). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Mar 3, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on P.E. & R.
upper
Feb 17, 2011
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
JV
Juan Vargas
DDemocratic
CA
40