Electricity: net energy metering.
Summary
Existing law, relative to private energy producers, requires every electric utility, as defined, to make available to an eligible customer-generator, as defined, a standard contract or tariff for net energy metering on a first-come-first-served basis until the time that the total rated generating capacity used by eligible customer-generators exceeds 5% of the electric utility's aggregate customer peak demand. The existing definition of an eligible customer-generator requires that the generating facility use a solar or wind turbine, or a hybrid system of both. This bill would revise the definition of an eligible customer-generator to instead require that the generating facility utilize a renewable source listed in the definition of a renewable electricity generation facility that is used for purposes of the Renewable Energy Resources Program administered by the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission. The bill would provide that a small hydroelectric generation facility is not an eligible renewable electrical generation facility if it will cause an adverse impact on instream beneficial uses or cause a change in the volume or timing of streamflow. Existing law established a pilot program to provide energy net metering for eligible biogas digester customer-generators. This bill would repeal that pilot program. The bill would make other conforming changes to reflect that repeal. Existing law establishes a net energy metering program that is available to an eligible fuel cell customer-generator, as defined. The existing definition of an eligible fuel cell customer-generator requires that the customer of an electrical corporation use technology that meets the definition of an "ultra-clean and low-emission distributed generation" in a specified statute. This bill would instead require that the customer of an electrical corporation use technology that the commission determines will achieve reductions in emissions of greenhouse gases and meets emissions requirements for eligibility for funding pursuant to the self-generation incentive program. Under existing law, a violation of the Public Utilities Act or any order, decision, rule, direction, demand, or requirement of the commission is a crime. Because an order of the commission would be required to implement certain of the bill's requirements and a violation of an order or decision of the commission implementing its requirements would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program by creating a new crime. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Aug 2011
Senate Passage
Jun 2011
Assembly Passage
Aug 2011
Signed into Law
Oct 2011
Introduced Feb 17, 2011
Signed Oct 8, 2011
Floor votes · Senate Jun 2, 2011 · Assembly Aug 29, 2011
How they voted
30–7
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 39
Jun 2, 2011
D
Democratic24
91% Yea
R
Republican15
53% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
29
Key actions
9
Committee
5
Amendments
4
Oct 8, 2011
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 30, 2011
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 30. Noes 8. Page 2160.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Aug 29, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (58-18-3)
assembly
Aug 29, 2011
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Aug 18, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 4.) (August 17).
lower
Jul 11, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 1.) (July 6).
lower
Jun 29, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on NAT. RES. (Ayes 13. Noes 0.) (June 27).
lower
Jun 16, 2011
Committee
Referred to Coms. on U. & C. and NAT. RES.
lower
Jun 2, 2011
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (30-7-2)
senate
May 31, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 8. Noes 0. Page 1118.) (May 26).
upper
May 10, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 2. Page 808.) (April 28).
upper
Mar 3, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on E., U., & C.
upper
Feb 17, 2011
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Lois Wolk
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 489
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 489. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline