SB 475 California Senate · 2011-2012 Regular Session

Local agencies: open meetings: teleconferences.

Summary
(1) The Ralph M. Brown Act requires, with specified exceptions, that all meetings of a legislative body of a local agency be open and public and all persons be permitted to attend. The act authorizes a legislative body to use teleconferencing, subject to specified requirements, including that each teleconference location be accessible to the public and that at least a quorum of the members of the body participate from locations within the boundaries of the territory over which the local agency exercises jurisdiction. Existing law provides that, in counties selected by the Director of Health Care Services with the concurrence of the county, a special county health authority may be established in order to meet the problems of delivery of publicly assisted medical care in each county, and to demonstrate ways of promoting quality care and cost efficiency. This bill, until January 1, 2018, would provide that, notwithstanding the provisions of the act on teleconferencing, with respect to a teleconference meeting of a county health authority established in a county under specified provisions, members of a health authority who are outside the jurisdiction may be counted toward the establishment of a quorum when participating in the teleconference if at least 50% of the number of members that would establish a quorum are present within the jurisdiction and the health authority provides a teleconference number and associated access codes, if any, that allows any person to call in to participate in the meeting, and that number and access codes are identified in the notice and agenda of the meeting. (2) Existing constitutional provisions require that a statute that limits the right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies be adopted with findings demonstrating the interest protected by the limitation and the need for protecting that interest. This bill would make legislative findings to that effect.
Bill status signed all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Aug 2012
Senate Passage
May 2011
Assembly Passage
Jun 2012
Signed into Law
Aug 2012
Introduced Feb 17, 2011 Signed Aug 28, 2012
Floor votes · Senate May 9, 2011 · Assembly Jun 28, 2012

How they voted

204
Passed · 7 other
Total votes 31
May 9, 2011
D Democratic20
9 Yea 4 Nay 7
45% Yea
R Republican11
11 Yea
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
34
Key actions
7
Committee
8
Amendments
2
Aug 28, 2012
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 13, 2012
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 35. Noes 0. Page 4466.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Aug 8, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: That the Assembly amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 9. Noes 0. Page 4455.)
upper
Jul 6, 2012
Committee
From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on GOV. & F. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 4306.) Re-referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
upper
Jul 2, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10.
upper
Jun 28, 2012
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (66-0-4)
assembly
Jun 28, 2012
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Jun 13, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (June 13).
lower
Jun 29, 2011
Committee
Set, second hearing. Failed passage in committee. Reconsideration granted.
lower
May 19, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
May 9, 2011
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (20-4-7)
senate
May 2, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 6. Noes 2. Page 762.) (April 27).
upper
Mar 3, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
upper
Feb 17, 2011
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor

Sponsors