Ontario International Airport.
Summary
Existing law provides for creation of airport districts. Existing law provides for transfer of the San Diego International Airport from the San Diego Unified Port District to the San Diego County Regional Airport Authority. This bill would establish the Ontario International Airport Authority as a local entity of regional government. The bill would establish the membership of the board of directors of the authority and set forth the powers of the authority. The bill would authorize the authority to enter into an agreement with the City of Los Angeles to facilitate the sale of, or the transfer of management and operational control of, the Ontario International Airport to the authority. The bill would require the authority, in cooperation with the City of Los Angeles and the City of Ontario, to develop a transition plan to facilitate the sale of, or the transfer of management and operational control of, the Ontario International Airport to the authority. The bill would also require the authority, the City of Los Angeles, the City of Ontario, the County of San Bernardino, other local and regional agencies, and the Department of Transportation to cooperate to develop effective surface transportation access to the Ontario International Airport. To the extent these provisions would impose additional duties on entities of local government, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Jun 2011
Senate Passage
May 2011
Assembly Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 16, 2011
Last action Jun 25, 2012
Floor votes · Senate May 31, 2011
How they voted
27–1
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 31
May 31, 2011
D
Democratic20
80% Yea
R
Republican11
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
19
Key actions
3
Committee
4
Amendments
1
Jun 9, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
May 31, 2011
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (27-1-3)
senate
May 23, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
May 9, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0. Page 864.) (May 3).
upper
Apr 14, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on T. & H.
upper
Feb 24, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Feb 16, 2011
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 9 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Robert Dutton
RRepublican
Co
Bob Huff
RRepublican
Co
BN
Brian Nestande
RRepublican
Co
CH
Curt Hagman
RRepublican
Co
KD
Kevin D Jeffries
RRepublican
Co
Mike Morrell
RRepublican
Co
NT
Norma Torres
DDemocratic
Co
Steve Knight
RRepublican
Co
TD
Tim Donnelly
RRepublican
Co
WA
Wilmer Amina Carter
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 446
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 446. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline