Hospitals: interpreters.
Summary
Existing law establishes the State Department of Public Health and sets forth its powers and duties, including, but not limited to, the licensing and certification of health facilities, including, but not limited to, general acute care hospitals. Existing law requires general acute care hospitals to, among other things, adopt and annually review its policy and procedures for providing assistance to patients with language or communication barriers to ensure access to health care information and services for limited-English-speaking or non-English-speaking residents and deaf residents. Existing law requires that the procedures ensure, to the extent possible, as determined by the hospital, that interpreters are available, either on the premises or accessible by telephone, 24 hours per day. This bill would, in addition, require the policy to ensure meaningful access to translation and interpreter services by limited-English-speaking or non-English-speaking individuals and to include appropriate criteria for demonstrating the proficiency of the translation and interpreter services. The bill would require the policy to include procedures for discussing with the patient any cultural, religious, or spiritual beliefs or practices of the patient that may influence care, and that the procedures be designed to increase hospital staff ability to understand and respond effectively to the cultural needs of patients. The bill would require the hospital to review the standards of health care interpreting, as prescribed. Existing law requires hospitals to notify their employees of the hospital's commitment to provide interpreters to all patients who request them. This bill would, in addition, require the hospital to notify employees of the hospital's commitment that the interpreter communicate information about the unique needs of the patient to the health care team.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Aug 2011
Senate Passage
Jun 2011
Assembly Passage
Aug 2011
Vetoed
Mar 2012
Introduced Feb 16, 2011
Vetoed Mar 1, 2012
Floor votes · Senate Jun 2, 2011 · Assembly Aug 30, 2011
How they voted
20–14
Passed · 5 other
Total votes 39
Jun 2, 2011
D
Democratic24
83% Yea
R
Republican15
93% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
28
Key actions
5
Committee
5
Amendments
1
Mar 1, 2012
Vetoed
Veto sustained.
upper
Mar 1, 2012
Vetoed
Consideration of Governor's veto stricken from file.
upper
Oct 9, 2011
Vetoed
In Senate. Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
upper
Oct 9, 2011
Vetoed
Vetoed by the Governor.
upper
Aug 30, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (51-27-1)
assembly
Aug 18, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (August 17).
lower
Jul 6, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 13. Noes 6.) (July 5). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 9, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on HEALTH.
lower
Jun 2, 2011
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (20-14-5)
senate
May 10, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Apr 25, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 1. Page 675.) (April 13).
upper
Feb 24, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on HEALTH.
upper
Feb 16, 2011
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
0 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
No sponsor information available.
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 442
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 442. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline