Battery: security officers and custodial officers.
Summary
Existing law establishes the crime of battery against, among other persons, any one of several specified public safety officers, or a physician or nurse rendering emergency medical care, when the person committing the offense knows or reasonably should know that the victim is such a person. The crime is punishable by a fine not exceeding $2,000, or by imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding one year, or by both that fine and imprisonment when an injury is not inflicted on the victim. This bill would add security officers and custody assistants to those lists of persons against whom the commission of a battery that does not result in an injury to the victim will be punishable by the penalties described above. The bill would define a security officer and a custody assistant for purposes of these provisions, as specified. Because the bill would expand the scope of an existing crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would incorporate additional changes to Section 243 of the Penal Code made by AB 109, which has been chaptered but is not yet operative. The bill would also incorporate additional changes proposed by SB 390 to become operative only if this bill and SB 390 are chaptered and this bill is chaptered last. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Aug 2011
Senate Passage
May 2011
Assembly Passage
Jul 2011
Signed into Law
Sep 2011
Introduced Feb 16, 2011
Signed Sep 6, 2011
Floor votes · Senate May 19, 2011 · Assembly Jul 14, 2011
How they voted
38–0
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 39
May 19, 2011
D
Democratic24
95% Yea
R
Republican15
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
26
Key actions
6
Committee
7
Amendments
1
Sep 6, 2011
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 15, 2011
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 37. Noes 0. Page 1910.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Jul 14, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (75-0-4)
assembly
Jul 14, 2011
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Jul 6, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (July 6).
lower
Jun 14, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 14). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 27, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
May 19, 2011
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (38-0-1)
senate
May 10, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Apr 26, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 742.) (April 26). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Feb 24, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Feb 16, 2011
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
CL
Carol Liu
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 406
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 406. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline