State parks: proposed closures: public notice.
Summary
(1) Existing law authorizes the Department of Parks and Recreation to enter into agreements between the department and federal and local governments and other public agencies for the care, maintenance, administration, and control of lands under the jurisdiction of any party to this agreement for the purpose of the state park system, as prescribed. This bill would require the department to post on its Internet Web site, at least 30 days prior to the date the department plans to close all, or a significant portion, of a unit of the state park system to public access, specified information about the proposed park closure, as defined, including information about how to contact the department in writing if an individual or other party is interested in entering into negotiations with the department for a contract or agreement to lease, operate, maintain, or provide concessions at a unit of the state park system that is proposed to be closed. The bill would require the department to respond in writing to any inquiry received in connection with the information provided pursuant to those provisions. (2) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Sep 2011
Senate Passage
May 2011
Assembly Passage
Aug 2011
Vetoed
Mar 2012
Introduced Feb 15, 2011
Vetoed Mar 1, 2012
Floor votes · Senate May 16, 2011 · Assembly Aug 25, 2011
How they voted
26–1
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 31
May 16, 2011
D
Democratic20
85% Yea
R
Republican11
81% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
28
Key actions
6
Committee
7
Amendments
2
Mar 1, 2012
Vetoed
Veto sustained.
upper
Mar 1, 2012
Vetoed
Consideration of Governor's veto stricken from file.
upper
Sep 21, 2011
Vetoed
In Senate. Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
upper
Sep 20, 2011
Vetoed
Vetoed by the Governor.
upper
Sep 1, 2011
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 38. Noes 0. Page 2227.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Aug 25, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (58-0-12)
assembly
Aug 25, 2011
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Aug 18, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (August 17).
lower
Jun 29, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 2.) (June 28).
lower
May 23, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on W., P. & W.
lower
May 16, 2011
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (26-1-4)
senate
May 10, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Apr 26, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0. Page 740.) (April 26). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 7, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on N.R. & W.
upper
Feb 24, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Feb 15, 2011
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
TH
Tom Harman
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 386
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 386. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline