State parks: local operating agreements.
Summary
(1) Existing law authorizes the Department of Parks and Recreation to enter into agreements with any agency of the United States or any city, county, district, or other public agency for the care, maintenance, administration, and control by a party to the agreement, of lands under the jurisdiction of any party to the agreement for purposes of the state park system. Existing law prohibits an operating agreement to be entered into or amended, unless, among other things, the Legislature has reviewed the lease or agreement, or amendment, as part of the annual budget process. This bill would require the department, if it proposes to fully close a unit of the state park system, with no planned public access, to notify the county or city in which the unit is located. Pursuant to procedures specified in the bill, a county or city would have the opportunity to take over operations and maintenance of the unit of the state park system. The bill would require the department to enter into negotiations with a county or city that notifies the department of its intention to take over the operation and maintenance of a unit of the state park system in response to the department's notice. The bill would require an agreement entered into to include certain provisions, including a provision that would require the length of the term of the agreement to be not less than one year and not longer than 5 years, with an option to renew upon the conclusion of the agreement. (2) Existing law vests with the Department of Parks and Recreation control over the state park system, including historical units of the state park system, and requires the department to implement laws intended to protect, develop, and preserve historical resources in the state. Existing law establishes the State Office of Historic Preservation in the department and authorizes the office to, among other things, enter into agreements for the preservation and management of historical resources under its control with public agencies, nonprofit organizations, private entities, or individuals, and to award grants not exceeding $1,000,000 or 50% of the cost of a project, on a competitive basis, to public agencies and nonprofit organizations for the preservation of historical resources. In this connection, the Budget Act of 2008 appropriated a specified amount of funds from the California Clean Water, Clean Air, Safe Neighborhood Parks, and Coastal Protection Fund to the department, to be available for expenditure until June 30, 2011, for a grant to the California State Railroad Museum Foundation for the rehabilitation and development of the boiler shop core, shell, and site rehabilitation and development at the California State Railroad Museum site, subject to specified terms and conditions. This bill would authorize the department to expend any remaining funds from that appropriation for a grant to the California State Railroad Museum Foundation for expenditure, until June 30, 2013, for the core, shell, and site and track rehabilitation and development of the erecting shop and the track rehabilitation and development of the boiler shop at the California State Railroad Museum site, subject to specified terms and conditions. By authorizing the department to expend those previously appropriated funds for the above-described purposes, the bill would make an appropriation.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Sep 2011
Senate Passage
Jun 2011
Assembly Passage
Sep 2011
Vetoed
Mar 2012
Introduced Feb 15, 2011
Vetoed Mar 1, 2012
Floor votes · Senate Jan 19, 2012 · Assembly Sep 9, 2011
How they voted
30–0
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 31
Jan 19, 2012
D
Democratic20
95% Yea
R
Republican11
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
37
Key actions
7
Committee
5
Amendments
4
Mar 1, 2012
Vetoed
Veto sustained.
upper
Mar 1, 2012
Vetoed
Consideration of Governor's veto stricken from file.
upper
Jan 19, 2012
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (30-0-1)
senate
Jan 19, 2012
Vetoed
Veto sustained. (Ayes 13. Noes 22. Page 2681.)
upper
Oct 4, 2011
Vetoed
In Senate. Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
upper
Oct 4, 2011
Vetoed
Vetoed by the Governor.
upper
Sep 9, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (66-1-3)
assembly
Sep 9, 2011
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 35. Noes 0. Page 2454.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Sep 9, 2011
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Aug 18, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (August 17).
lower
Jun 29, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 2.) (June 28).
lower
Jun 20, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on W., P. & W.
lower
May 27, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 9. Noes 0. Page 1115.) (May 26).
upper
May 2, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0. Page 740.) (April 26).
upper
Apr 7, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on N.R. & W.
upper
Feb 24, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Feb 15, 2011
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
SB
Sam Blakeslee Ph.D.
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 356
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 356. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline