Taxation: administration: litigation: fees.
Summary
Existing law provides that a prevailing party in a court action may be awarded attorney's fee under specified circumstances, and laws governing the administration of franchise and income tax laws provide that a prevailing party may be awarded a judgment for reasonable litigation costs incurred, in the case of any civil proceeding brought by or against the State of California in a court of record of this state, in connection with the determination, collection, or refund of any tax, interest, or penalty under the Personal Income Tax Law and the Corporation Tax Law as specified. This bill would make the provision of law governing the administration of franchise and income tax laws the exclusive means to award attorney's fees in any civil proceeding described above, and would prohibit attorney's fees from being awarded pursuant to any other statutory provision or common law doctrine regarding the award of attorney's fees. This bill also would prohibit a person from charging a contingent fee, as defined, for any matter involving a tax imposed under the Revenue and Taxation Code, and would impose a penalty, as provided, for failing to comply with this requirement. This bill would authorize specified state agencies to request a written certification from those persons, filed under penalty of perjury, that a fee charged for those services does not include a contingent fee. By expanding the scope of the crime of perjury, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
in committee
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 15, 2011
Last action Jan 31, 2012
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
17
Key actions
4
Committee
7
May 2, 2011
Upper · Passed
Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
May 2, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Apr 27, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on RLS. (Ayes 7. Noes 2. Page 762.) (April 27). Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Apr 14, 2011
Upper · Passed
Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Apr 7, 2011
Upper · Passed
Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Mar 17, 2011
Upper · Passed
Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Feb 24, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
upper
Feb 15, 2011
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Lois Wolk
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 342
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 342. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline