Elder and dependent adult abuse.
Summary
Existing law provides for the confidentiality of financial records but does not prohibit various state and local officers and agencies from requesting information from an office or branch of a financial institution and the office or branch from responding to the request, as to whether a person has an account or accounts at that office or branch and, if so, any identifying numbers of the account or accounts. Existing law provides that a county adult protective services office and a long-term care ombudsman when investigating the financial abuse of an elder or dependent adult is similarly not prohibited from requesting financial information and the office or branch is not prohibited from responding to the request. The Elder Abuse and Dependent Adult Civil Protection Act establishes procedures for the reporting, investigation, and prosecution of elder and dependent adult abuse. The act requires persons, defined as mandated reporters, to report known or suspected instances of elder or dependent adult abuse. Under the act, care custodians of elder or dependent adults and local law enforcement agencies are mandated reporters. A violation of the reporting requirements by a mandated reporter is a misdemeanor. Existing law, until January 1, 2013, includes within these reporting requirements mandated reporters of suspected financial abuse, as defined, and, with certain exceptions, makes failure to comply with these requirements subject to a civil penalty. This bill would delete the January 1, 2013, repeal date. This bill would incorporate additional changes in Section 15630.1 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, proposed by SB 718, to be operative only if SB 718 and this bill are both chaptered and become effective on or before January 1, 2012, and this bill is chaptered last.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Dec 2010
Committee Review
Aug 2011
Senate Passage
May 2011
Assembly Passage
Aug 2011
Signed into Law
Sep 2011
Introduced Dec 6, 2010
Signed Sep 30, 2011
Floor votes · Senate May 5, 2011 · Assembly Aug 25, 2011
How they voted
30–0
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 31
May 5, 2011
D
Democratic20
95% Yea
R
Republican11
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
29
Key actions
7
Committee
8
Amendments
1
Sep 30, 2011
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 30, 2011
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 37. Noes 0. Page 2146.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Aug 25, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (69-0-1)
assembly
Aug 25, 2011
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Jul 6, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (July 5).
lower
Jun 27, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Jun 22, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (June 21).
lower
May 16, 2011
Committee
Referred to Coms. on AGING & L.T.C. and PUB. S.
lower
May 5, 2011
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (30-0-1)
senate
Apr 13, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 4. Noes 0. Page 642.) (April 12).
upper
Apr 7, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 579.) (April 6). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Jan 20, 2011
Committee
Referred to Coms. on B. & F.I. and JUD.
upper
Dec 6, 2010
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 2 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Joseph Simitian
DDemocratic
Co
Donald Wagner
RRepublican
Co
Lois Wolk
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 33
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 33. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline