Civil service: rejected probationer: investigation.
Summary
Existing law requires the service of a probationary period under specified circumstances, including when an employee enters the civil service. Under existing law, the probationer may be rejected by the appointing power during the probationary period for reasons relating to the probationer's qualifications, the good of the service, or failure to demonstrate merit, efficiency, fitness, and moral responsibility. Existing law requires the State Personnel Board to prescribe rules regarding the time in which a probationer may be rejected and take certain actions in an investigation of the reasons for that rejection. Existing law exempts employees of State Bargaining Unit 5, the California Association of Highway Patrolmen, from these rules and actions of the board, as specified. This bill would delete these exceptions relating to members of State Bargaining Unit 5.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Jun 2011
Senate Passage
Mar 2011
Assembly Passage
Jun 2011
Signed into Law
Jul 2011
Introduced Feb 14, 2011
Signed Jul 1, 2011
Floor votes · Senate Mar 29, 2011 · Assembly Jun 13, 2011
How they voted
29–0
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 31
Mar 29, 2011
D
Democratic20
100% Yea
R
Republican11
81% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
20
Key actions
6
Committee
5
Amendments
1
Jun 30, 2011
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Jun 16, 2011
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 35. Noes 0. Page 1443.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Jun 13, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (60-5-5)
assembly
Jun 13, 2011
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Jun 8, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (June 8).
lower
Apr 28, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on P.E., R. & S.S.
lower
Mar 29, 2011
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (29-0-2)
senate
Mar 22, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 416.) (March 21).
upper
Feb 24, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on P.E. & R.
upper
Feb 14, 2011
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
0 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
No sponsor information available.
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 318
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 318. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline