Property taxation: welfare exemption: leased property: City of San Diego: Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Diego.
Summary
Existing property tax law, in accordance with the California Constitution, provides for a "welfare exemption" for property that is used exclusively for religious, hospital, scientific, or charitable purposes and that is owned or operated by certain types of nonprofit entities if certain qualifying criteria are met. This bill would provide that property used exclusively for charitable purposes and located within the former Naval Training Center in San Diego and leased by the City of San Diego or the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Diego to a nonprofit entity or to an entity controlled by the nonprofit entity shall be deemed to be included within the welfare exemption and shall be entitled to a partial exemption, as specified, in any year in which the development of the property is being financed with funds made available through specified federal tax credit programs. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute. By imposing new duties upon local tax officials with respect to the welfare exemption, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions. Section 2229 of the Revenue and Taxation Code requires the Legislature to reimburse local agencies annually for certain property tax revenues lost as a result of any exemption or classification of property for purposes of ad valorem property taxation. This bill would provide that, notwithstanding Section 2229 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, no appropriation is made and the state shall not reimburse local agencies for property tax revenues lost by them pursuant to the bill. This bill would take effect immediately as a tax levy.
Bill status
died
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Jun 2012
Senate Passage
May 2011
Assembly Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 14, 2011
Last action Jun 18, 2012
Floor votes · Senate May 23, 2011
How they voted
30–0
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 31
May 23, 2011
D
Democratic20
100% Yea
R
Republican11
90% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
20
Key actions
5
Committee
7
Amendments
1
Jun 18, 2012
Committee
Set, second hearing. Failed passage in committee.
lower
Jun 27, 2011
Lower · Passed
Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Jun 13, 2011
Lower · Passed
Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Jun 2, 2011
Committee
Referred to Coms. on REV. & TAX. and APPR.
lower
May 23, 2011
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (30-0-1)
senate
May 16, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 9. Noes 0. Page 949.) (May 11).
upper
Apr 26, 2011
Upper · Passed
Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Mar 31, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
upper
Feb 24, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Feb 14, 2011
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
JV
Juan Vargas
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 314
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 314. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline