Local development.
Summary
 (1) Existing law authorizes the legislative body of a city or county to adopt an infrastructure financing plan, which is required to contain specified information, for the purpose of financing certain infrastructure facilities, if specified procedural requirements are met, and requires the legislative body, if it adopts the plan, to submit the proposal to the voters. Existing law authorizes the legislative body to create an infrastructure financing district, by ordinance, if 23 of the qualified electors of the proposed district vote in favor of adoption of the plan, and also authorizes the legislative body to initiate proceedings to issue bonds to finance the infrastructure facilities if 23 of those electors vote in favor of the issuance. Existing law authorizes infrastructure finance districts to finance specified projects, including financing certain infrastructure facilities. This bill would authorize a district to reimburse a developer that meets specified requirements for permit expenses or expenses related to the construction of affordable housing units pursuant to the Transit Priority Project Program described below. This bill would also require that an infrastructure financing plan also include a plan to finance any potential costs for reimbursing a developer that meets specified requirements for permit and affordable housing expenses related to a project of the Transit Priority Project Program. (2) The Transit Village Development Planning Act of 1994 authorizes a city or county to create a transit village plan for a transit village development district that addresses specified characteristics. In order to increase transit ridership and to reduce vehicle traffic on the highways, the act encourages local, regional, and state plans to direct new development close to transit stations and provide financial incentives to implement these plans. This bill would establish the Transit Priority Project Program, and authorize a city or county to participate in the program by adopting an ordinance indicating its intent to participate in the program and by forming an infrastructure financing district. The bill would require a city or county that elects to participate in the program to amend, if necessary, its general plan, and any related specific plan, to authorize participating developers to build at an increased height of a minimum of 3 stories within the newly created infrastructure financing district. This bill would exempt from its provisions a city or county that has adopted specified language in its charter, or by ordinance or resolution.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Sep 2011
Senate Passage
May 2011
Assembly Passage
Sep 2011
Signed into Law
Oct 2011
Introduced Feb 14, 2011
Signed Oct 3, 2011
Floor votes · Senate May 19, 2011 · Assembly Sep 8, 2011
How they voted
21–13
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 35
May 19, 2011
D
Democratic23
91% Yea
R
Republican12
100% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
32
Key actions
6
Committee
9
Amendments
1
Oct 3, 2011
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 9, 2011
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 22. Noes 15. Page 2451.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Sep 8, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (43-26-3)
assembly
Sep 8, 2011
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Aug 31, 2011
Committee
Action rescinded whereby the bill was re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.
upper
Aug 29, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.
lower
Jul 6, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 3.) (July 6).
lower
Jun 29, 2011
Lower · Passed
Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
May 27, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
May 19, 2011
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (21-13-1)
senate
Apr 27, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on RLS. (Ayes 6. Noes 3. Page 762.) (April 27). Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Mar 31, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Coms. on GOV. & F. and RLS.
upper
Feb 24, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Feb 14, 2011
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Loni Hancock
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 310
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 310. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline