SB 292 California Senate · 2011-2012 Regular Session

California Environmental Quality Act: administrative and judicial review procedures: City of Los Angeles: stadium.

Summary
(1) The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of, an environmental impact report (EIR) on a project that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. CEQA also requires a lead agency to prepare a mitigated negative declaration for a project that may have a significant effect on the environment if revisions in the project would avoid or mitigate that effect and there is no substantial evidence that the project, as revised, would have a significant effect on the environment. CEQA establishes administrative procedures for the review and certification of the EIR for a project and judicial review procedures for any action or proceeding brought to challenge the lead agency's decision to certify the EIR or to grant project approvals. This bill would establish specified administrative and judicial review procedures for the administrative and judicial review of the EIR and approvals granted for a project related to the development of a specified stadium in the City of Los Angeles. Because the lead agency would be required to use these alternative procedures for administrative review of the EIR if the project applicant so chooses, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would require the lead agency and applicant to implement specified measures, as a condition of approval of the project, to minimize traffic congestion and air quality impacts that may result from spectators driving to the stadium. (2) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. (3) This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the development of a stadium in the City of Los Angeles.
Bill status signed all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Sep 2011
Senate Passage
May 2011
Assembly Passage
Sep 2011
Signed into Law
Sep 2011
Introduced Feb 14, 2011 Signed Sep 27, 2011
Floor votes · Senate May 27, 2011 · Assembly Sep 7, 2011

How they voted

290
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 31
May 27, 2011
D Democratic20
19 Yea 1
95% Yea
R Republican11
10 Yea 1
90% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
42
Key actions
9
Committee
14
Amendments
3
Sep 27, 2011
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 9, 2011
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 32. Noes 7. Page 2443.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Sep 8, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: That the Assembly amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 2433.)
upper
Sep 8, 2011
Committee
From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on E.Q. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 2382.) Re-referred to Com. on E.Q.
upper
Sep 8, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10.
upper
Sep 7, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (56-10-4)
assembly
Sep 7, 2011
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Sep 6, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 11. Noes 1.) (September 6).
lower
Sep 6, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (September 6). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Sep 6, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Coms. on NAT. RES. and APPR. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.
lower
Aug 29, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (August 25).
lower
Aug 17, 2011
Committee
Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Jul 6, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 1.) (July 5). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 21, 2011
Lower · Passed
Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Jun 9, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on HIGHER ED.
lower
May 27, 2011
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (29-0-2)
senate
May 17, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
May 4, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 0. Page 850.) (May 4). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Mar 31, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on ED.
upper
Feb 24, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Feb 14, 2011
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 19 co-sponsors

Sponsors