SB 28 California Senate · 2011-2012 Regular Session

Vehicles: electronic wireless communications devices: prohibitions.

Summary
(1) Existing law requires the Department of Motor Vehicles to examine applicants for specific driver's licenses and requires that the examination include, among other things, a test of the applicant's knowledge and understanding of the provisions of the Vehicle Code governing the operation of vehicles upon the highways. This bill would require the department to include a test of the applicant's understanding of the distractions and dangers of handheld cell phone use and text messaging while operating a motor vehicle. (2) Existing law establishes that specified convictions and violations under the Vehicle Code and traffic-related incidents count as points against a driver's record for purposes of the suspension or revocation of the privilege to drive. Under existing law, it is an infraction for any person to drive a motor vehicle while using a wireless telephone, unless that telephone is designed and configured to allow hands-free listening and talking operation, and is used in that manner while driving, except as otherwise provided. A person under 18 years of age is prohibited from driving a motor vehicle while using a wireless telephone, even if equipped with a hands-free device, or while using a mobile service device. A point is not given for a violation of these provisions. This bill would assess a violation point on a 2nd or subsequent violation of these provisions. (3) Under existing law, a person is prohibited from driving a motor vehicle while using an electronic wireless communications device to write, send, or read a text-based communication, except as specified. This bill would require that this provision does not apply if the electronic wireless communications device is specifically designed and configured to allow voice-operated and hands-free operation to write, send, or read a text-based communication, and it is used in that manner while driving. The bill also would increase the base fines for a violation of any of the above-described prohibitions involving driving a motor vehicle while using a wireless telephone or electronic wireless communications device from $20 to $50 and the fine for a 2nd or subsequent offense from $50 to $100, would apply similar prohibitions to a person riding a bicycle, would impose a total fine of $20 for a first offense and $50 for each subsequent offense for a violation when the offense is committed while riding a bicycle, and would provide that a violation point is not given for a conviction of a violation while riding a bicycle. By expanding the scope of existing crimes, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (4) Existing law prohibits a law enforcement officer from stopping a vehicle for the sole purpose of determining whether the driver is violating the prohibition of driving a motor vehicle while using a wireless telephone. This bill would delete that prohibition. (5) Existing law requires that the base fines collected from violations of the Vehicle Code for crimes other than parking offenses are subject to distribution to specified funds of a state or local agency as set forth by statute or to the proper funds of a city or county, as applicable. This bill would require the county treasurer to submit $10 from each fine collected under this provision for violating the above-described prohibitions involving driving a motor vehicle while using a wireless telephone or electronic wireless communications device to the Controller, for deposit into the Distracted Driver Education Fund, which would be created in the State Treasury for an education program on the dangers of cell phone use and text messaging while driving, thereby imposing a state-mandated local program by imposing a new duty on local officials. The bill would require the Legislature, upon appropriation in the Budget Bill, to allocate this money to the Office of Traffic Safety in the Business, Transportation and Housing Agency for this purpose. The bill would authorize the county treasurer to also withhold a sufficient amount from each fine collected for violations involving riding a bicycle while using a wireless telephone or electronic wireless communications device to reimburse the courts in the county for their actual, reasonable, and necessary costs associated with processing violations under the law involving those prohibitions. (6) This bill would incorporate changes to Section 12804.9 of the Vehicle Code proposed by both this bill and AB 82, which would become operative only if both bills are enacted and become effective on or before January 1, 2012, but AB 82 becomes operative first, and this bill is enacted after AB 82. (7) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Bill status vetoed 4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Dec 2010
Committee Review
Aug 2011
Senate Passage
Apr 2011
Assembly Passage
Jul 2011
Vetoed
Sep 2011
Introduced Dec 6, 2010 Vetoed Sep 6, 2011
Floor votes · Senate Apr 25, 2011 · Assembly Jul 14, 2011

How they voted

2010
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 31
Apr 25, 2011
D Democratic20
18 Yea 1 Nay 1
90% Yea
R Republican11
2 Yea 9 Nay
81% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
26
Key actions
5
Committee
5
Amendments
3
Feb 29, 2012
Vetoed
Consideration of Governor's veto stricken from file.
upper
Sep 6, 2011
Vetoed
In Senate. Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
upper
Sep 6, 2011
Vetoed
Vetoed by the Governor.
upper
Aug 15, 2011
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 23. Noes 13. Page 1912.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Jul 14, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (43-20-7)
assembly
Jul 14, 2011
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Jul 6, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 10. Noes 5.) (July 6).
lower
Jun 14, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 13. Noes 1.) (June 13). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 2, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on TRANS.
lower
Apr 25, 2011
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (20-10-1)
senate
Apr 13, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 1. Page 599.) (April 11).
upper
Mar 30, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 3. Page 495.) (March 29). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jan 20, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on T. & H.
upper
Dec 6, 2010
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor

Sponsors