Air districts: adverse effects of air pollution: intellectual property.
Summary
Existing law authorizes local and regional districts to have the primary responsibility for control of air pollution from all sources, other than emissions from motor vehicles. This bill would authorize the districts to sponsor, coordinate, and promote projects that will lead to the prevention, mitigation, or cure of the adverse effects of air pollution, including the adverse health effects of air pollution. The bill, until January 1, 2017, would authorize a district to negotiate what share, if any, of the intellectual property, or benefits resulting from intellectual property, developed from the use of district funds, including funds discharged as grants, will accrue to that district. The bill would require revenues generated from revenue sharing agreements to be deposited into a special account and used for specified purposes. Under certain circumstances, the bill would prohibit a district from receiving a benefit pursuant to these provisions in excess of the amount of the district's investment. If the state or a subdivision of the state purchases or licenses a process, machine, or article of manufacture for which a district accrues a benefit resulting from the intellectual property interest, the bill would require the district, upon the request of the Department of General Services, to provide reimbursement to the General Fund for the amount of the benefit accrued. The bill would require a district that attempts to negotiate for benefits pursuant to these provisions to report annually to the Legislature, as provided.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Aug 2011
Senate Passage
May 2011
Assembly Passage
Aug 2011
Signed into Law
Oct 2011
Introduced Feb 3, 2011
Signed Oct 8, 2011
Floor votes · Senate May 31, 2011 · Assembly Aug 25, 2011
How they voted
24–14
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 39
May 31, 2011
D
Democratic24
100% Yea
R
Republican15
93% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
30
Key actions
9
Committee
7
Amendments
3
Oct 8, 2011
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 30, 2011
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 25. Noes 13. Page 2148.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Aug 25, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (47-27-5)
assembly
Aug 25, 2011
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Aug 18, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (August 17).
lower
Jul 11, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (July 6).
lower
Jun 23, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on NAT. RES. (Ayes 6. Noes 3.) (June 22). Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
lower
Jun 9, 2011
Committee
Referred to Coms. on L. GOV. and NAT. RES.
lower
May 31, 2011
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (24-14-1)
senate
May 23, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
May 9, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 1. Page 854.) (May 2).
upper
Mar 31, 2011
Upper · Passed
Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Feb 17, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on E.Q.
upper
Feb 3, 2011
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Fran Pavley
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 170
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 170. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline