Medi-Cal: providers: fraud.
Summary
Existing law provides for the Medi-Cal program, which is administered by the State Department of Health Care Services, under which qualified low-income individuals receive health care services. The Medi-Cal program is, in part, governed and funded by federal Medicaid Program provisions. Existing law requires an applicant or provider, as defined, to submit a complete application package for enrollment, continuing enrollment, or enrollment at a new location or a change in location, and requires the application form for enrollment, the provider agreement, and all attachments or changes to be signed under penalty of perjury. Existing law authorizes the department, upon receipt of reliable evidence, as described, of fraud or willful misrepresentation by a provider, or upon the commencement of a specified suspension of a provider, to, among other things, withhold payment for any goods, services, supplies, or merchandise, or any portion thereof. Existing law prohibits the department from enrolling any applicant that has been convicted of any felony or misdemeanor involving fraud or abuse in any government program. This bill would revise these provisions to require, upon receipt of a credible allegation of fraud for which an investigation is pending under the Medi-Cal program against a provider, or upon the commencement of the specified suspension of a provider, that the provider be temporarily placed under payment suspension, unless it is determined there is good cause, as defined, not to suspend the payments or to suspend them only in part. This bill would prohibit the department from enrolling a provider in, or would require the department to terminate the provider from, the Medi-Cal program, if it is discovered that the provider has been terminated under Medicare or under the Medicaid Program or Children's Health Insurance Program in any other state, and would provide that a temporary suspension may be lifted if a resolution of an investigation for fraud or abuse occurs, as defined. This bill would require, commencing as specified, the department to conduct a criminal background check and require submission of a set of fingerprints when the department designates a provider as a "high" categorical risk, as specified. This bill would require the department, commencing as specified and with some exceptions, to collect an application fee for enrollment, including enrollment at a new location or a change in location in the amount calculated by the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. This bill would authorize the department to establish a temporary moratorium on enrollment of providers under specified circumstances. This bill would make other related and conforming changes. This bill would require, on a quarterly basis, that the Department of Justice, and any other law enforcement agency that has accepted referrals for investigation from the department, report to the department a listing of each referral, stating whether the referral continues to be under investigation and whether it involves a credible allegation of fraud. To the extent that this bill increases the duties of local law enforcement agencies, this bill would create a state-mandated local program. This bill would authorize the department, effective January 1, 2012, to enter into contracts with one or more eligible Medicaid Recovery Audit Contractors pursuant to specified federal law. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2012
Committee Review
Aug 2012
Senate Passage
May 2012
Assembly Passage
Aug 2012
Signed into Law
Sep 2012
Introduced Feb 24, 2012
Signed Sep 29, 2012
Floor votes · Senate May 14, 2012 · Assembly Aug 23, 2012
How they voted
24–9
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 35
May 14, 2012
D
Democratic23
100% Yea
R
Republican12
75% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
32
Key actions
9
Committee
6
Amendments
3
Sep 29, 2012
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 27, 2012
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 25. Noes 12. Page 4856.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Aug 24, 2012
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Aug 23, 2012
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (45-25-2)
assembly
Aug 16, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (August 16).
lower
Aug 6, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 4.) (July 3).
lower
Jun 19, 2012
Lower · Passed
Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
May 25, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on HEALTH.
lower
May 14, 2012
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (24-9-2)
senate
May 8, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 3445.) (May 7).
upper
Apr 23, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 2. Page 3230.) (April 18).
upper
Mar 22, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on HEALTH.
upper
Feb 24, 2012
Introduced
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
EA
Elaine Alquist
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 1529
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 1529. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline