Common interest developments.
Summary
Existing law, the Davis-Stirling Common Interest Development Act, requires the declaration of a common interest development recorded on or after January 1, 1986, to contain a legal description of the development and the restrictions on the use or enjoyment of any portion of the development. Existing law also provides that the covenants and restrictions in the declaration of a common interest development shall be enforceable equitable servitudes, unless unreasonable. This bill would prohibit the owner of a separate interest in a common interest development from being subject to a provision in a governing document, or a provision in an amendment to a governing document, that prohibits the rental or leasing of all or any of the separate interests in that common interest development to a renter, lessee, or tenant unless that governing document, or amendment thereto, was effective prior to the date the owner acquired title to his or her separate interest. The bill would also authorize that owner to expressly consent to be subject to a governing document or amendment thereto with that specified prohibition. Existing law requires the owner of a separate interest, except as specified, to provide specified documents and information to a prospective purchaser as soon as practicable before transfer of title to the separate interest or execution of a real property sales contract therefor. This bill would, in addition, require the owner of a separate interest to provide a statement describing any provision in the governing documents that prohibits the rental or leasing of any of the separate interests in the common interest development to a renter, lessee, or tenant, and its applicability, if there is such a provision. This bill would incorporate additional changes to Civil Code Section 1368 proposed by AB 771 that would become operative only if both this bill and AB 771 are chaptered and take effect on or before January 1, 2012, and this bill is chaptered last.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Jun 2011
Senate Passage
May 2011
Assembly Passage
Jun 2011
Signed into Law
Jul 2011
Introduced Feb 1, 2011
Signed Jul 8, 2011
Floor votes · Senate May 31, 2011 · Assembly Jun 23, 2011
How they voted
38–0
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 39
May 31, 2011
D
Democratic24
100% Yea
R
Republican15
93% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
26
Key actions
6
Committee
7
Amendments
2
Jul 7, 2011
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Jun 27, 2011
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 37. Noes 0. Page 1572.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Jun 23, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (71-0-8)
assembly
Jun 23, 2011
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Jun 21, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (June 21).
lower
Jun 15, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (June 15). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Jun 9, 2011
Committee
Referred to Coms. on H. & C.D. and JUD.
lower
May 31, 2011
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (38-0-1)
senate
May 16, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 950.) (May 10).
upper
May 4, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 8. Noes 0. Page 864.) (May 3). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Apr 14, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Coms. on T. & H. and JUD.
upper
Feb 10, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Feb 1, 2011
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 150
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 150. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline